Literature DB >> 30274032

Durability of self-healing dental composites: A comparison of performance under monotonic and cyclic loading.

Mobin Yahyazadehfar1, George Huyang2, Xiaohong Wang2, Yuwei Fan3, Dwayne Arola4, Jirun Sun5.   

Abstract

Durability is an important quality of dental restorative materials, and the ability to autonomously heal damage incurred during their oral function is highly desirable.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the improvement in durability of self-healing dental composites (SHDCs) in terms of their resistance to fracture and capacity for healing of damage under monotonic and cyclic loading.
METHODS: SHDCs were prepared by incorporating dental resin composites with microcapsules containing healing liquid. Control specimens with the same mass fraction (5% and 25%) of microcapsules filled with water were also evaluated. Two sets of SHDCs were distinguished by the silane coupling agents that functionalized and bonded the microcapsules to resin network. One set used a methacrylate silane (MA-silane) that connected resin network through covalent bonds, and the other used a H-bonding forming hydroxyl silane (OH-silane). The fatigue crack growth resistance was assessed in terms of the threshold stress intensity range and the conventional Paris Law parameters. Cyclic loading was conducted at 5 Hz with maximum cyclic load ranged between approximately 1 N and 5 N. The efficiency of the autonomous healing was determined per the recovering of the fracture toughness and the extension of fatigue life.
RESULTS: The SHDCs with 5 wt% of healing microcapsules exhibited a larger fracture toughness than those with 25 wt% microcapsules. MA-silane SHDCs had approximately five times more responsive microcapsules triggered by fracturing of the composites. Consequently, the MA-silane SHDCs with 5 wt% of microcapsules achieved the best performance in terms of fracture toughness and healing efficiency. In regards to the fatigue crack growth behavior, there was a significant increase in the resistance to fatigue crack growth and 580 ± 15% improvement in the fatigue life. SIGNIFICANCE: Strong silanization is vital in SHDCs to simultaneously achieve clinically applicable mechanical performance and substantial healing capability. Moreover, the evaluation of self-healing under cyclic loading is a promising tool in quantifying the degree of fracture-induced healing.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental composites; Fatigue; Fracture; Self-healing; Silane coupling agents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30274032      PMCID: PMC6192528          DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  38 in total

Review 1.  Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports.

Authors:  I A Mjör; F Toffenetti
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.677

Review 2.  Resin composite--state of the art.

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges.

Authors:  Yasaman Delaviz; Yoav Finer; J Paul Santerre
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Autonomic healing of polymer composites.

Authors:  S R White; N R Sottos; P H Geubelle; J S Moore; M R Kessler; S R Sriram; E N Brown; S Viswanathan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Shrinkage strain-rates of dental resin-monomer and composite systems.

Authors:  Mohammad Atai; David C Watts; Zahra Atai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  The reduction in fatigue crack growth resistance of dentin with depth.

Authors:  J Ivancik; N K Neerchal; E Romberg; D Arola
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 8.  Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  F Beck; S Lettner; A Graf; B Bitriol; N Dumitrescu; P Bauer; A Moritz; A Schedle
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.

Authors:  N J M Opdam; E M Bronkhorst; B A C Loomans; M C D N J M Huysmans
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  An examination of fatigue striations in human dentin: in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  D Bajaj; N Sundaram; D Arola
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.368

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Application and potential future directions of self-healing polymers in dentistry].

Authors:  Xiao-Xi Wang; Shuo Yao; Chuan-Jian Zhou; Jun-Ling Wu
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

Review 2.  Resin based restorative dental materials: characteristics and future perspectives.

Authors:  Bhanu Pratap; Ravi Kant Gupta; Bhuvnesh Bhardwaj; Meetu Nag
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2019-10-21

3.  3D Printing of Resin Material for Denture Artificial Teeth: Chipping and Indirect Tensile Fracture Resistance.

Authors:  Yoo-Jin Chung; Ji-Man Park; Tae-Hyung Kim; Jin-Soo Ahn; Hyun-Suk Cha; Joo-Hee Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.623

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.