Literature DB >> 15348008

The processing and characterization of animal-derived bone to yield materials with biomedical applications: part 1: modifiable porous implants from bovine condyle cancellous bone and characterization of bone materials as a function of processing.

G S Johnson1, M R Mucalo, M A Lorier.   

Abstract

A study on the development of a process to form materials suitable for biomedical xenograft implants from bovine cancellous bone is presented. Bone cubes cut from the condyle portion of bovine femurs sourced from abattoir waste were subjected to a defatting and subsequent deproteination procedure to produce shape-modifiable materials in which the biocompatible mineral calcium hydroxycarbonate apatite component was preserved in the original osseous architecture of the bovine bone. Optimum defatting was achieved by (1) thawing of the precut bone cubes in water, (2) pressure cooking at 15 psi in water, (3) soaking in 0.1 mol l(-1) NaOH followed by a thorough rinse under running water, (4) microwave heating of the bone cubes in water, (5) refluxing in methyl acetate and finally (6) removal of internal liquid from the cubes by shaking and then air drying. Subsequent deproteination of the defatted bone cubes was optimally achieved by (1) soaking in 5% sodium hypochlorite solution at ambient temperature using ultrasonication, (2) thorough rinsing of the cubes in water followed by drying. The final product is a defatted/deproteinated, bleached material that can be molded into various shapes for implant use in the body. The bone specimens were characterized by a suite of analytical techniques (i.e. infrared, 31P and 13C solid magic-angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies, atomic absorption (AA) spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectrometry, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)) in order to follow compositional changes during the various stages of processing. In general, bovine condyles proved to be the best source of xenograft materials with condyles from other animal species (i.e. deer, sheep and ostrich) being too small to constitute a utilizable source of cancellous bone. This study shows how value can be added to a hitherto underutilized abattoir by-product by using simple processing techniques. Copyright 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 15348008     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008987908917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  19 in total

1.  Molecular structure at the bone-implant interface: a vibrational spectroscopic characterization.

Authors:  M A Walters; N C Blumenthal; Y Leung; Y Wang; J L Ricci; J M Spivak
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Composition of fluoridated dental enamel studied by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ESCA).

Authors:  D M Hercules; N L Craig
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Measurement of the density of trabecular bone.

Authors:  D J Sharp; K E Tanner; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Microwave extraction. A novel sample preparation method for chromatography.

Authors:  K Ganzler; A Salgó; K Valkó
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1986-12-26

5.  Determination of the mineral phases and structure of the bone-implant interface using Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Y Leung; M A Walters; N C Blumenthal; J L Ricci; J M Spivak
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1995-05

6.  Solid state phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance imaging of bone mineral.

Authors:  J R Moore; L Garrido; J L Ackerman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Structural evaluation of human and sheep bone and comparison with synthetic hydroxyapatite by FT-Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  I Rehman; R Smith; L L Hench; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1995-10

8.  Contribution of collagen and mineral to the elastic anisotropy of bone.

Authors:  K Hasegawa; C H Turner; D B Burr
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Fat in bone xenografts: importance of the purification procedures on cleanliness, wettability and biocompatibility.

Authors:  D Chappard; C Fressonnet; C Genty; M F Baslé; A Rebel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy of synthetic and biological calcium phosphates.

Authors:  G R Sauer; W B Zunic; J R Durig; R E Wuthier
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  5 in total

1.  Biological monitoring of a xenomaterial for grafting: an evaluation in critical-size calvarial defects.

Authors:  Thais Accorsi-Mendonça; Willian Fernando Zambuzzi; Clóvis Monteiro Bramante; Tânia Mari Cestari; Rumio Taga; Márcia Sader; Glória Dulce de Almeida Soares; José Mauro Granjeiro
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Three structural roles for water in bone observed by solid-state NMR.

Authors:  Erin E Wilson; Ayorinde Awonusi; Michael D Morris; David H Kohn; Mary M J Tecklenburg; Larry W Beck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Correlation between structure and compressive strength in a reticulated glass-reinforced hydroxyapatite foam.

Authors:  S Callcut; J C Knowles
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Biomaterials from human bone - probing organic fraction removal by chemical and enzymatic methods.

Authors:  A P Mamede; A R Vassalo; E Cunha; D Gonçalves; S F Parker; L A E Batista de Carvalho; M P M Marques
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 5.  A Review on the Use of Hydroxyapatite-Carbonaceous Structure Composites in Bone Replacement Materials for Strengthening Purposes.

Authors:  Humair A Siddiqui; Kim L Pickering; Michael R Mucalo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.