OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of pain arising from the zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain and to determine whether any clinical features could distinguish patients with and without such pain. METHODS: Sixty three patients with chronic low back pain were studied prospectively. All patients underwent a detailed history and physical examination as well as a series of intra-articular zygapophysial joint injections of 0.5% bupivacaine starting at the symptomatic level to a maximum of three levels or until the pain was abolished. They also received injections of normal saline into paraspinal muscles to act as controls. RESULTS: All patients proceeded with the injections. Twenty (32%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20 to 44%) obtained greater than 50% relief of their pain following the administration of saline. Fifty seven patients completed the study; 23 of them (40%; 95% CI 27 to 53%) failed to obtain relief following the injection of saline but obtained relief following one or more intra-articular injections of local anaesthetic. None of the historical features or clinical tests could discriminate those patients with and those without zygapophysial joint pain. CONCLUSION: Pain originating from the zygapophysial joint is not uncommon, but this study failed to find any clinical predictors in patients with such pain.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of pain arising from the zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain and to determine whether any clinical features could distinguish patients with and without such pain. METHODS: Sixty three patients with chronic low back pain were studied prospectively. All patients underwent a detailed history and physical examination as well as a series of intra-articular zygapophysial joint injections of 0.5% bupivacaine starting at the symptomatic level to a maximum of three levels or until the pain was abolished. They also received injections of normal saline into paraspinal muscles to act as controls. RESULTS: All patients proceeded with the injections. Twenty (32%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20 to 44%) obtained greater than 50% relief of their pain following the administration of saline. Fifty seven patients completed the study; 23 of them (40%; 95% CI 27 to 53%) failed to obtain relief following the injection of saline but obtained relief following one or more intra-articular injections of local anaesthetic. None of the historical features or clinical tests could discriminate those patients with and those without zygapophysial joint pain. CONCLUSION:Pain originating from the zygapophysial joint is not uncommon, but this study failed to find any clinical predictors in patients with such pain.
Authors: M E Revel; V M Listrat; X J Chevalier; M Dougados; M P N'guyen; C Vallee; M Wybier; F Gires; B Amor Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Gerard P Varlotta; Todd R Lefkowitz; Mark Schweitzer; Thomas J Errico; Jeffrey Spivak; John A Bendo; Leon Rybak Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2010-06-26 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Patrick Freyhardt; Tony Hartwig; Maximilian De Bucourt; Martin Maurer; Diane Renz; Bernhard Gebauer; Bernd Hamm; Ulf K M Teichgräber; Florian Streitparth Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vijay Singh; Frank J E Falco; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 3.738