Literature DB >> 17449278

Lumbar-pelvic range and coordination during lifting tasks.

A Maduri1, B L Pearson, S E Wilson.   

Abstract

Spine motion has been described to have two regions, a neutral zone where lumbar rotation can occur with little resistance and an elastic zone where structures such as ligaments, facet joints and intervertebral disks resist rotation. In vivo, the passive musculature can contribute to further limiting the functional neutral range of lumbar motion. Movement out of this functional neutral range could potentially put greater loads on these structures. In this study, the range of lumbar curvature rotation was examined in twelve healthy, untrained volunteers at four torso inclination angles. The lumbar curvature during straight-leg lifting tasks was then defined as a percentage of this range of possible lumbar curvatures. Subjects were found to remain neutrally oriented during the flexion phase of a lifting task. During the extension phase of the lifting task, however, subjects were found to assume a more kyphotic posture, approaching the edge of the functional range of motion. This was found to be most pronounced for heavy lifting tasks. By allowing the lumbar curvature to go into a highly kyphotic posture, subjects may be taking advantage of stretch-shortening behavior in extensor musculature and associated tendons to reduce the energy required to raise the torso. Such a kyphotic posture during extension, however, may put excessive loading on the elastic structures of the spine and torso musculature increasing the risk of injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449278      PMCID: PMC2610367          DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  29 in total

1.  Muscle efficiency: the controversial role of elasticity and mechanical energy conversion in stretch-shortening cycles.

Authors:  G J Ettema
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Low back pain: an economic assessment in the United States.

Authors:  Seema Pai; Lakshmi J Sundaram
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Effects of repetitive lifting on kinematics: inadequate anticipatory control or adaptive changes?

Authors:  J H van Dieën; P van der Burg; T A Raaijmakers; H M Toussaint
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Potential of lumbodorsal fascia forces to generate back extension moments during squat lifts.

Authors:  S Gracovetsky
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-03

5.  Separation of active and passive components of short-range stiffness of muscle.

Authors:  D L Morgan
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1977-01

6.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.

Authors:  W S Marras; S A Lavender; S E Leurgans; F A Fathallah; S A Ferguson; W G Allread; S L Rajulu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Changes in lumbar lordosis modify the role of the extensor muscles.

Authors:  S M McGill; R L Hughson; K Parks
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Lumbar posture--should it, and can it, be modified? A study of passive tissue stiffness and lumbar position during activities of daily living.

Authors:  Joan P Scannell; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-10

9.  Flexion-relaxation response to cyclic lumbar flexion.

Authors:  Michael W Olson; Li Li; Moshe Solomonow
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Fatigue-related changes in the coordination of lifting and their effect on low back load.

Authors:  J H van Dieën; H M Toussaint; C Maurice; M Mientjes
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of volitional spine stabilization on lifting task in recurrent low back pain population.

Authors:  Ram Haddas; James Yang; Isador Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Novice lifters exhibit a more kyphotic lifting posture than experienced lifters in straight-leg lifting.

Authors:  A E Riley; T D Craig; N K Sharma; S A Billinger; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Clinical and Ergonomic Comparison Between a Robotic Assisted Transfer Device and a Mobile Floor Lift During Caregiver-Assisted Wheelchair Transfers.

Authors:  Mark Greenhalgh; Eline Blaauw; Nikitha Deepak; Matthew St Laurent; Rosemarie Cooper; Roxanna Bendixen; Garrett G Grindle; Alicia M Koontz; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Effects of Volitional Spine Stabilization on Trunk Control During Asymmetric Lifting Task in Patients With Recurrent Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Ram Haddas; Yigal Samocha; James Yang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-28

5.  Lumbar Extension during Stoop Lifting is Delayed by the Load and Hamstring Tightness.

Authors:  Risa Iwasaki; Ginga Yokoyama; Satoshi Kawabata; Tomotaka Suzuki
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-02-06

6.  Fear-avoidance beliefs are associated with reduced lumbar spine flexion during object lifting in pain-free adults.

Authors:  Deborah Knechtle; Stefan Schmid; Magdalena Suter; Fabienne Riner; Greta Moschini; Marco Senteler; Petra Schweinhardt; Michael L Meier
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.961

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.