Literature DB >> 15346265

[Influence of sequence type on the extent of the susceptibility artifact in MRI--a shoulder specimen study after suture anchor repair].

T Herold1, W C Caro, G Heers, L Perlick, J Grifka, S Feuerbach, W Nitz, M Lenhart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the extent of susceptibility artifacts after metallic suture anchor implantation by analyzing 14 different MRI sequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A metallic suture anchor was implanted in the central area of three glenoid porcine specimens. The specimens were imaged with a 1.5 T scanner using a protocol of 14 standard sequences including gradient echo, spin echo and turbo spin echo sequences with and without fat-saturation. Artifact size was measured for each specimen and sequence. The resulting mean artifact areas were determined for each type of sequence and the mean values of the three specimens compared.
RESULTS: Gradient echo-sequences produced significantly larger artifact areas than the spin echo and turbo spin echo sequences, whereby the artifacts of the 3D-gradient echo sequences were smaller than the artifacts of the 2D-gradient echo sequences. A turbo spin echo sequence with a high readout band width and a short effective echo time showed the best results. For the conventional spin echo sequence, a reduction in the echo time did not significantly decrease the artifact size. Spectral fat-saturation did not affect the area of the susceptibility artifact compared to the non-saturated sequence.
CONCLUSION: Gradient echo sequences should not be used after metallic suture anchor repair. Turbo spin echo sequences showed a decrease in the artifact size compared to conventional spin echo sequences and should be performed with a short effective echo time and a high band width. Spectral fat- saturation did not increase the artifact size significantly.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15346265     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  6 in total

1.  The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.

Authors:  T Ernstberger; G Heidrich; T Bruening; S Krefft; G Buchhorn; H M Klinger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  MR imaging of the knee in patients with medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: comparison among sequences at 1.5 T.

Authors:  A Aliprandi; F Perona; M Bandirali; P Randelli; P Cabitza; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Felix H Blankenstein; Patrick Asbach; Florian Beuer; Johannes Glienke; Stefan Mayer; Christine Zachriat
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Implant detectibility of intervertebral disc spacers in post fusion MRI: evaluation of the MRI scan quality by using a scoring system--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Thorsten Ernstberger; Gabert Heidrich; Wolfgang Schultz; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  [Imaging in evaluating rotator cuff tears].

Authors:  A Hedtmann; G Heers
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials.

Authors:  T Ernstberger; G Buchhorn; G Heidrich
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 1.568

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.