Damon C Scales1, Andreas Laupacis. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, M4N 3M5, Toronto, Canada. damon.scales@utoronto.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heath technology assessments (HTAs) evaluate the benefits and costs of devices for monitoring and therapy (and their associated requirements for human resources) which contribute to the high expense associated with ICU admission. DISCUSSION: Given the limited resources available for health care and increasing demands, funds spent inefficiently or unnecessarily on technologies in the ICU may threaten the sustainability of the health care system or prevent other potentially cost-effective devices from being introduced into clinical care. We discuss the factors impeding the conducting of HTAs in the ICU and suggest strategies for change. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the need for HTAs of ICU devices only few have been conducted. They should be undertaken more frequently, and their results used to influence clinical practice and hospital and regional-level policy decisions.
BACKGROUND: Heath technology assessments (HTAs) evaluate the benefits and costs of devices for monitoring and therapy (and their associated requirements for human resources) which contribute to the high expense associated with ICU admission. DISCUSSION: Given the limited resources available for health care and increasing demands, funds spent inefficiently or unnecessarily on technologies in the ICU may threaten the sustainability of the health care system or prevent other potentially cost-effective devices from being introduced into clinical care. We discuss the factors impeding the conducting of HTAs in the ICU and suggest strategies for change. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the need for HTAs of ICU devices only few have been conducted. They should be undertaken more frequently, and their results used to influence clinical practice and hospital and regional-level policy decisions.
Authors: J S Groeger; M A Strosberg; N A Halpern; R C Raphaely; W E Kaye; K K Guntupalli; D L Bertram; D M Greenbaum; T P Clemmer; T J Gallagher Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Herbert P Wiedemann; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Douglas Hayden; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-05-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G R Bernard; A Artigas; K L Brigham; J Carlet; K Falke; L Hudson; M Lamy; J R Legall; A Morris; R Spragg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Karen E A Burns; Tasnim Sinuff; Neill K J Adhikari; Maureen O Meade; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Claudio M Martin; Deborah J Cook Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: S Harvey; K Stevens; D Harrison; D Young; W Brampton; C McCabe; M Singer; K Rowan Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Andrés Esteban; Pilar Fernández-Segoviano; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; José Antonio Aramburu; Laura Nájera; Niall D Ferguson; Inmaculada Alía; Federico Gordo; Fernando Ríos Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-09-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-02-29 Impact factor: 17.440