Literature DB >> 22273821

[Ethics consultations in intensive care medicine].

T Bein1, B M Graf.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An increase in ethical conflicts is being observed in the modern intensive care setting, as more complex therapeutic strategies are available and the treatment of old and very old patients is integrated into the clinical routine due to changes in medical options and social epidemiology. Physicians, nurses and families need ethical support to come to a decision about medical treatment when value conflicts are involved.
METHODS: The basis of medical ethics is reported followed by a presentation of personal experiences and a reference overview regarding the impact of ethics consultations.
RESULTS: Common ethical conflicts in the intensive care setting result from the lack of precise knowledge on patient preferences and due the use of modern "high-tech" intensive care medicine the prognosis of recovery and quality of life of (old) patients seems to be difficult to assess. Ethical definitions of treatment perspectives will find an important and increasing place in intensive care competence in the future, although currently there is a lack of theoretical and practical instruction in ethics. The goal of ethics consultations is to help physicians, nurses and family members by a structuration of the problem and by a moderation of discussion and problem resolution including a special ethical workflow. Ethics consultations seem to be useful in resolving conflicts that may inappropriately prolong unwanted treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The increase of the incidence of ethical conflicts in the intensive care setting may impact ethics consultations which help the integration of ethical principles into the clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22273821     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-011-1976-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ethics consultation in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.687

2.  The costs of nonbeneficial treatment in the intensive care setting.

Authors:  Todd Gilmer; Lawrence J Schneiderman; Holly Teetzel; Jeffrey Blustein; Kathleen Briggs; Felicia Cohn; Ronald Cranford; Daniel Dugan; Glen Kamatsu; Ernlé Young
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  [End of life decisions in intensive care].

Authors:  P Schmucker; H Strätling-Tölle; M Strätling
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.698

Review 4.  End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  John M Luce
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  [Saving life and permitting death. Decision conflicts in intensive medicine].

Authors:  F Salomon
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  S A Hurst; S C Hull; G DuVal; M Danis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Clinical ethics and the quality initiative: a pilot study for the empirical evaluation of ethics case consultation.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Nilson; Cathleen A Acres; Naomi G Tamerin; Joseph J Fins
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Half the family members of intensive care unit patients do not want to share in the decision-making process: a study in 78 French intensive care units.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Frédéric Pochard; Sylvie Chevret; Christophe Adrie; Djilali Annane; Gérard Bleichner; Caroline Bornstain; Yves Bouffard; Yves Cohen; Marc Feissel; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Christophe Guitton; Jan Hayon; Esther Iglesias; Luc-Marie Joly; Mercé Jourdain; Christian Laplace; Christine Lebert; Juliette Pingat; Catherine Poisson; Anne Renault; Olivier Sanchez; Dominique Selcer; Jean-François Timsit; Jean-Roger Le Gall; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Report of 255 clinical ethics consultations and review of the literature.

Authors:  Keith M Swetz; Mary Eliot Crowley; Christopher Hook; Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Between patient autonomy and the ethics of care : difficult end-of-life decision-making in intensive care].

Authors:  F Erbguth
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Take a position on changes in therapy aims and limiting therapy: Actio moralis practiced in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  T Bein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Ethical case discussions in the intensive care unit : from testing to routine].

Authors:  B Meyer-Zehnder; U Barandun Schäfer; H Albisser Schleger; S Reiter-Theil; H Pargger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 1.041

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.