Literature DB >> 1534211

Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin upon multiple-dose intravenous administration of 3, 12, and 30 milligrams per kilogram of body weight to healthy male volunteers.

J A Smithers1, H K Kulmala, G A Thompson, K K Antony, E W Lewis, S J Ruberg, M T Kenny, J K Dulworth, M A Brackman.   

Abstract

Teicoplanin pharmacokinetics were evaluated after multiple-dose intravenous administration to healthy male volunteers by using a randomized, double-blind, parallel design. Doses of 3, 12, or 30 mg of teicoplanin per kg of body weight were administered every 24 h for 14 days as 60-min constant-rate intravenous infusions. Blood and urine samples were collected over 21 days and analyzed by a microbiological assay. Twenty-three subjects were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. The median pharmacokinetic parameters upon multiple-dose intravenous administration of 3, 12, and 30 mg/kg included steady-state volumes of distribution of 0.94, 0.77, and 0.68 liter/kg; total clearances of 11.9, 12.0, and 13.2 ml/h/kg; and terminal disposition half-lives of 143, 166, and 96 h, respectively. Renal clearance accounted for approximately 95% of total clearance. No dose-related differences existed for teicoplanin total or renal clearance. The steady-state volume of distribution decreased significantly with increasing doses. As a result of the decrease in the volume of distribution, the terminal disposition half-life at 30 mg/kg was significantly decreased. However, the decreases in the volume of distribution and terminal disposition half-life are of limited clinical importance, since steady-state trough concentrations in serum increase in proportion to dose. Combined results of all multiple-dose studies with similar durations of sample collection indicate no dose-related differences for any pharmacokinetic parameters from 3 to 12 mg/kg. As observed in the present study, no dose-related differences exist for teicoplanin total and renal clearances from 3 to 30 mg/kg. However, at 30 mg/kg, a significant decrease in the steady-state volume of distribution is observed. As a consequence of the reduction in the volume of distribution at 30 mg/kg with no change in clearance, the terminal disposition half-life is decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1534211      PMCID: PMC189237          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.36.1.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  17 in total

1.  Linear pharmacokinetic equations allowing direct calculation of many needed pharmacokinetic parameters from the coefficients and exponents of polyexponential equations which have been fitted to the data.

Authors:  J G Wagner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1976-10

2.  Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in man after intravenous administration.

Authors:  G L Traina; M Bonati
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1984-04

3.  The bias due to incomplete matching.

Authors:  P R Rosenbaum; D B Rubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  In vitro activity and human pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  L Verbist; B Tjandramaga; B Hendrickx; A Van Hecken; P Van Melle; R Verbesselt; J Verhaegen; P J De Schepper
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Effect of altered plasma protein binding on apparent volume of distribution.

Authors:  S Oie; T N Tozer
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  M Rowland
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  In vitro activity of teichomycin compared with those of other antibiotics.

Authors:  H C Neu; P Labthavikul
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Teichomycin: in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation in comparison with other antibiotics.

Authors:  R Pallanza; M Berti; B P Goldstein; E Mapelli; E Randisi; R Scotti; V Arioli
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a new formulation of teicoplanin following intravenous and intramuscular administration to humans.

Authors:  K K Antony; E W Lewis; M T Kenny; J K Dulworth; M B Brackman; R Kuzma; L Yuh; M G Eller; G A Thompson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.534

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.

Authors:  O Lortholary; M Tod; N Rizzo; C Padoin; O Biard; P Casassus; L Guillevin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Teicoplanin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Authors:  C M Spencer; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Penetration of teicoplanin into heart valves and subcutaneous and muscle tissues of patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

Authors:  U K Frank; E Schmidt-Eisenlohr; D Mlangeni; M Schindler; A Hoh; F Beyersdorf; F D Daschner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evaluating the optimal dose of teicoplanin with therapeutic drug monitoring: not too high for adverse event, not too low for treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Si-Ho Kim; Cheol-In Kang; Kyungmin Huh; Sun Young Cho; Doo Ryeon Chung; Soo-Youn Lee; Yae-Jean Kim; Kyong Ran Peck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Daptomycin or teicoplanin in combination with gentamicin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a highly glycopeptide-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  F Caron; M D Kitzis; L Gutmann; A C Cremieux; B Maziere; J M Vallois; A Saleh-Mghir; J F Lemeland; C Carbon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Teicoplanin: 10 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  M Trautmann; H Wiedeck; M Ruhnke; M Oethinger; R Marre
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Implementation and evaluation of a stochastic control strategy for individualizing teicoplanin dosage regimen.

Authors:  M Tod; P Alet; O Lortholary; O Petitjean
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-12

Review 9.  Teicoplanin. A reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D H Peters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Teicoplanin physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling offers a quantitative assessment of a theoretical influence of serum albumin and renal function on its disposition.

Authors:  Chie Emoto; Trevor N Johnson; Takaaki Yamada; Hiroshi Yamazaki; Tsuyoshi Fukuda
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.