OBJECTIVES: To evaluate emergency medical technicians' (EMTs) experiences with the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) program and learn about attitudes regarding its effectiveness. DESIGN: Anonymous survey mailed to a stratified random sample. SETTING: Tri-County Portland, Oregon, area. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 572 Oregon EMT respondents (out of 1,048 surveys) were included in the analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Survey questions about experiences with the POLST form and opinions about POLST. RESULTS: Respondents were mostly male (76%) and paramedics (66%). Most respondents (73%) had treated a patient with a POLST, and 74% reported receiving education about POLST. EMTs reported that POLST, when present, changed treatment in 45% of cases. Seventy-five percent of the respondents agreed that the POLST form provides clear instructions about patient preferences, and 93% agreed that the POLST form is useful in determining which treatments to provide when the patient is in cardiopulmonary arrest. Fewer (63%) agreed that the form is useful in determining treatments when the patient has a pulse and is breathing. CONCLUSION: Most respondents have experience with the POLST program. EMTs find the POLST form useful and often use it to change treatment decisions for patients. Copyright 2004 American Geriatrics Society
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate emergency medical technicians' (EMTs) experiences with the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) program and learn about attitudes regarding its effectiveness. DESIGN: Anonymous survey mailed to a stratified random sample. SETTING: Tri-County Portland, Oregon, area. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 572 Oregon EMT respondents (out of 1,048 surveys) were included in the analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Survey questions about experiences with the POLST form and opinions about POLST. RESULTS: Respondents were mostly male (76%) and paramedics (66%). Most respondents (73%) had treated a patient with a POLST, and 74% reported receiving education about POLST. EMTs reported that POLST, when present, changed treatment in 45% of cases. Seventy-five percent of the respondents agreed that the POLST form provides clear instructions about patient preferences, and 93% agreed that the POLST form is useful in determining which treatments to provide when the patient is in cardiopulmonary arrest. Fewer (63%) agreed that the form is useful in determining treatments when the patient has a pulse and is breathing. CONCLUSION: Most respondents have experience with the POLST program. EMTs find the POLST form useful and often use it to change treatment decisions for patients. Copyright 2004 American Geriatrics Society
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Susan E Hickman; Christine A Nelson; Alvin H Moss; Bernard J Hammes; Allison Terwilliger; Ann Jackson; Susan W Tolle Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Neil S Wenger; Judy Citko; Kate O'Malley; Allison Diamant; Karl Lorenz; Victor Gonzalez; Derjung M Tarn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Susan E Hickman; Alexia M Torke; Greg A Sachs; Rebecca L Sudore; Qing Tang; Giorgos Bakoyannis; Nicholette Heim Smith; Anne L Myers; Bernard J Hammes Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 5.128