Literature DB >> 24551342

Electronic end-of-life care registry: the Utah ePOLST initiative.

Jeffrey Duncan1, Peter Taillac1, Barry Nangle2, Maureen Henry3, Janice Houston2, Shaida Talebreza4, Leisa Finch2, Cherie Brunker5, Deepthi Rajeev6, Heidi J Smith6, Christie North6.   

Abstract

As a patient's end-of-life approaches, it is typical for the disease to be the focus of treatment instead of the dying patient. There is limited congruence between the care preferred by patients and the treatment actually delivered to patients during their end-of-life. The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Paradigm has been endorsed or is in development in all but three states and the District of Columbia in an effort to ensure that patients are provided with adequate opportunities to specify their end-of-life care preferences. However, most states are using paper forms to document these preferences which may be inaccessible when needed. We have developed an electronic end-of-life care registry that allows authorized users to store and retrieve information pertaining to patients' end-of-life care preferences. In this paper, we describe (a) the requirements identified for the registry from the users' perspective and (b) the design and development of the electronic registry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24551342      PMCID: PMC3900183     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  13 in total

1.  Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives.

Authors:  Henry S Perkins
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.

Authors:  J Teno; J Lynn; N Wenger; R S Phillips; D P Murphy; A F Connors; N Desbiens; W Fulkerson; P Bellamy; W A Knaus
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decisions and the use of resources for seriously ill patients? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

Authors:  J M Teno; J Lynn; R S Phillips; D Murphy; S J Youngner; P Bellamy; A F Connors; N A Desbiens; W Fulkerson; W A Knaus
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1994

4.  A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care.

Authors:  M Danis; L I Southerland; J M Garrett; J L Smith; F Hielema; C G Pickard; D M Egner; D L Patrick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A method to communicate patient preferences about medically indicated life-sustaining treatment in the out-of-hospital setting.

Authors:  P M Dunn; T A Schmidt; M M Carley; M Donius; M A Weinstein; V T Dull
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 6.  The need to revise assumptions about the end of life: implications for social work practice.

Authors:  M Bern-Klug; C Gessert; S Forbes
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2001-02

7.  The Oregon physician orders for life-sustaining treatment registry: a preliminary study of emergency medical services utilization.

Authors:  Terri A Schmidt; Elizabeth A Olszewski; Dana Zive; Erik K Fromme; Susan W Tolle
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment program: Oregon emergency medical technicians' practical experiences and attitudes.

Authors:  Terri A Schmidt; Susan E Hickman; Susan W Tolle; Heather S Brooks
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  The Patient Self-Determination Act and the future of advance directives.

Authors:  P J Greco; K A Schulman; R Lavizzo-Mourey; J Hansen-Flaschen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The status of medical education in end-of-life care: a national report.

Authors:  Amy M Sullivan; Matthew D Lakoma; Susan D Block
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  2 in total

1.  Crash course in EPaCCS (Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems): 8 years of successes and failures in patient data sharing to learn from.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Julia Riley; Julian Abel; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.568

2.  Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jennifer Kryworuchko; P H Strachan; E Nouvet; J Downar; J J You
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.