Literature DB >> 15338595

Thermal characterization of PMMA-based bone cement curing.

Chaodi Li1, James Mason, Don Yakimicki.   

Abstract

In thermal characterization tests of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement performed according to the ASTM Standard Specification for Acrylic Bone Cement, time-temperature profiles of bone cement were observed to be sensitive to the thickness of the cement patty and the mold material. Due to the heat transfer from cement to the surrounding mold, such tests might underestimate the exothermic temperature of bone cement. Developing test methods to better characterize cement thermal behavior is necessary for accurate cement curing simulations. In this paper, the effects of the mold material and geometry on experimental measurements of bone cement setting temperature and setting time were evaluated by conducting the polymerization in different test molds. Finite element (FE) numerical simulations were also performed to provide a further understanding of these effects. It was found that the mold material and geometry significantly influence the values of the parameters measured using the ASTM standard. Results showed that the setting temperature measured was about 50 degrees C lower in a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mold than in a polyurethane (PU) foam mold for the 6 mm thickness cement. The measured peak temperature using PTFE molds varied about 75 degrees C for different mold heights (6mm vs. 40 mm), but only by 28 degrees C with PU molds. The measured setting time with PTFE molds varied by about 740 s for different mold heights (6 mm vs. 40 mm), while only by about 130 s for PU molds. Using PU foam materials for the test mold decreases cement heat transfer effects due to the poor heat conductivity of PU foam and provides more consistent measured results. FE parametric studies also support these observations. Poor conductivity materials, like PU foam, make better molds for the characterization of bone cement thermal behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15338595     DOI: 10.1023/b:jmsm.0000010101.45352.d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  6 in total

1.  Finite element thermal analysis of bone cement for joint replacements.

Authors:  Chaodi Li; Shiva Kotha; Chen-Hsi Huang; James Mason; Don Yakimicki; Michael Hawkins
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur.

Authors:  J CHARNLEY
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1960-02

3.  In-situ polymerization behaviour of bone cements.

Authors:  A Maffezzoli; D Ronca; G Guida; I Pochini; L Nicolais
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Thermodynamic considerations of acrylic cement implant at the site of giant cell tumors of the bone.

Authors:  E C Krishnan; C Nelson; J R Neff
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Fracture of femoral prostheses in total hip replacement. A clinical study.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Isothermal and non-isothermal polymerization of a new bone cement.

Authors:  A Borzacchiello; L Ambrosio; L Nicolais; E J Harper; K E Tanner; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.896

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Injectability and mechanical properties of magnesium phosphate cements.

Authors:  Claus Moseke; Vasileios Saratsis; Uwe Gbureck
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Heat distribution of polymerisation temperature of bone cement on the spinal canal during vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Bernd Wegener; Nicole Zolyniak; Mehmet F Gülecyüz; Andreas Büttner; Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr; Veronika Schaffer; Volkmar Jansson; Christof Birkenmaier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.

Authors:  Serge Marbacher; Lukas Andereggen; Salome Erhardt; Ali-Reza Fathi; Javier Fandino; Andreas Raabe; Jürgen Beck
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Effect of microencapsulated phase change materials on the thermo-mechanical properties of poly(methyl-methacrylate) based biomaterials.

Authors:  Roberto De Santis; Veronica Ambrogi; Cosimo Carfagna; Luigi Ambrosio; Luigi Nicolais
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Recollapse of previous vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  D H Heo; D K Chin; Y S Yoon; S U Kuh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Experimental and computational approach investigating burst fracture augmentation using PMMA and calcium phosphate cements.

Authors:  Sami M Tarsuslugil; Rochelle M O'Hara; Nicholas J Dunne; Fraser J Buchanan; John F Orr; David C Barton; Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Viability of permanent PMMA spacer with combined free fasciocutaneous tissue transfer for failed charcot reconstruction: A 38 month prospective case report.

Authors:  Tammer Elmarsafi; John S Steinberg; Paul J Kim; Christopher E Attinger; Karen K Evans
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-04

8.  Polymethyl methacrylate cure time in simulated in vivo total knee arthroplasty versus in vitro conditions.

Authors:  Daniel A Funk; Quang-Viet Nguyen; Michael Swank
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.