Literature DB >> 15336403

Identification of a promoter motif regulating the major DNA damage response mechanism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Vera Gamulin1, Helena Cetkovic, Ivan Ahel.   

Abstract

The principal response of many bacteria to DNA damage is mediated by a mechanism dependent on the LexA and RecA proteins. However, Mycobacterium tuberculosis was recently reported to regulate a majority of DNA repair genes independently of RecA and LexA, suggesting that an unknown RecA/LexA-independent mechanism controls the major DNA damage response pathway in this organism. Here we have identified a motif tTGTCRgtg-8nt-TAnnnT that defines a novel RecA/LexA-independent promoter (RecA-NDp) of M. tuberculosis. Furthermore, we show that the RecA-NDp type of promoter precedes DNA repair genes in other Actinomycetales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15336403     DOI: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  29 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage responses in prokaryotes: regulating gene expression, modulating growth patterns, and manipulating replication forks.

Authors:  Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Effects of conserved residues and naturally occurring mutations on Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG helicase activity.

Authors:  Ephrem Debebe Zegeye; Seetha V Balasingham; Jon K Laerdahl; Håvard Homberset; Per E Kristiansen; Tone Tønjum
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  RecA-independent DNA damage induction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ruvC despite an appropriately located SOS box.

Authors:  Lisa F Dawson; Joanna Dillury; Elaine O Davis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Preexisting variation in DNA damage response predicts the fate of single mycobacteria under stress.

Authors:  Giulia Manina; Anna Griego; Lalit Kumar Singh; John D McKinney; Neeraj Dhar
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Essential roles for imuA'- and imuB-encoded accessory factors in DnaE2-dependent mutagenesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Digby F Warner; Duduzile E Ndwandwe; Garth L Abrahams; Bavesh D Kana; Edith E Machowski; Ceslovas Venclovas; Valerie Mizrahi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  SigG does not control gene expression in response to DNA damage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv.

Authors:  Katherine L Smollett; Lisa F Dawson; Elaine O Davis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Bioluminescent Reporters for Rapid Mechanism of Action Assessment in Tuberculosis Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Krupa Naran; Atica Moosa; Clifton E Barry; Helena I M Boshoff; Valerie Mizrahi; Digby F Warner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Role of stress response sigma factor SigG in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Jong-Hee Lee; Deborah E Geiman; William R Bishai
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Activation of the eis gene in a W-Beijing strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis correlates with increased SigA levels and enhanced intracellular growth.

Authors:  Shiping Wu; Peter F Barnes; Buka Samten; Xiuhua Pang; Sébastien Rodrigue; Saleena Ghanny; Patricia Soteropoulos; Luc Gaudreau; Susan T Howard
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Experimental determination of translational start sites resolves uncertainties in genomic open reading frame predictions - application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Katherine L Smollett; Amanda S Fivian-Hughes; Joanne E Smith; Anchi Chang; Tara Rao; Elaine O Davis
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.