Literature DB >> 15330770

Air movement--good or bad?

J Toftum1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Air movement--good or bad? The question can only be answered by those who are exposed when they are exposed. Human perception of air movement depends on environmental factors including air velocity, air velocity fluctuations, air temperature, and personal factors such as overall thermal sensation and activity level. Even for the same individual, sensitivity to air movement may change from day to day as a result of, e.g., different levels of fatigue. Based on existing literature, the current paper summarizes factors influencing the human perception of air movement and attempts to specify in general terms when air movement is desirable and when it is not. At temperatures up to 22-23 degrees C, at sedentary activity and with occupants feeling neutral or cooler there is a risk of air movement being perceived as unacceptable, even at low velocities. In particular, a cool overall thermal sensation negatively influences the subjective perception of air movement. With occupants feeling warmer than neutral, at temperatures above 23 degrees C or at raised activity levels, humans generally do not feel draught at air velocities typical for indoor environments (up to around 0.4 m/s). In the higher temperature range, very high air velocities up to around 1.6 m/s have been found to be acceptable at air temperatures around 30 degrees C. However, at such high air velocities, the pressure on the skin and the general disturbance induced by the air movement may cause the air movement to be undesirable. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Based on existing literature, the paper summarizes factors influencing the human perception of air movement and attempts to specify in general terms when air movement is desirable and when it is not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15330770     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00271.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  8 in total

1.  No consistent risk factor pattern for symptoms related to the sick building syndrome: a prospective population based study.

Authors:  Charlotte Brauer; Henrik Kolstad; Palle Ørbaek; Sigurd Mikkelsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Air movement preferences observed in office buildings.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Edward Arens; Sahar Abbaszadeh Fard; Charlie Huizenga; Gwelen Paliaga; Gail Brager; Leah Zagreus
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Air movement preferences observed in naturally ventilated buildings in humid subtropical climate zone in China.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Guoqiang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Physiological activity in calm thermal indoor environments.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Okamoto; Kaori Tamura; Naoyuki Miyamoto; Shogo Tanaka; Takaharu Futaeda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Physiological and subjective comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a cooling environment.

Authors:  Kaori Tamura; Sayaka Matsumoto; Yu Hsuan Tseng; Takayuki Kobayashi; Jun'ichi Miwa; Ken'ichi Miyazawa; Toyotaka Hirao; Soichiro Matsumoto; Seiji Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Otake; Tsuyoshi Okamoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment.

Authors:  Kaori Tamura; Sayaka Matsumoto; Yu Hsuan Tseng; Takayuki Kobayashi; Jun'ichi Miwa; Ken'ichi Miyazawa; Soichiro Matsumoto; Seiji Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Otake; Tsuyoshi Okamoto
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Gender, airborne chemical monitoring, and physical work environment are related to indoor air symptoms among nonindustrial workers in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.

Authors:  Aizat Ismail Syazwan; Juahir Hafizan; Mohd Rafee Baharudin; Ahmad Zaid Fattah Azman; Zulkapri Izwyn; Ismail Zulfadhli; Katis Syahidatussyakirah
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Field evaluation of thermal and acoustical comfort in eight North-American buildings using embedded radiant systems.

Authors:  Megan Dawe; Caroline Karmann; Stefano Schiavon; Fred Bauman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.