Literature DB >> 17235538

Air movement preferences observed in office buildings.

Hui Zhang1, Edward Arens, Sahar Abbaszadeh Fard, Charlie Huizenga, Gwelen Paliaga, Gail Brager, Leah Zagreus.   

Abstract

Office workers' preferences for air movement have been extracted from a database of indoor environmental quality surveys performed in over 200 buildings. Dissatisfaction with the amount of air motion is very common, with too little air movement cited far more commonly than too much air movement. Workers were also surveyed in a detailed two-season study of a single naturally ventilated building. About one-half the building's population wanted more air movement and only 4% wanted less. This same ratio applied when the air movement in workspaces was higher than 0.2 m/s, the de facto draft limit in the current ASHRAE and ISO thermal environment standards. Preference for "less air motion" exceeded that for "more" only at thermal sensations of -2 (cool) or colder. These results raise questions about the consequences of the ASHRAE and ISO standards' restrictions on air movement, especially for neutral and warm conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17235538     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-006-0079-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  3 in total

1.  Listening to the occupants: a Web-based indoor environmental quality survey.

Authors:  Leah Zagreus; Charlie Huizenga; Edward Arens; David Lehrer
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.770

2.  Perception of draught in ventilated spaces.

Authors:  P O Fanger; N K Christensen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Air movement--good or bad?

Authors:  J Toftum
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.770

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Air movement preferences observed in naturally ventilated buildings in humid subtropical climate zone in China.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Guoqiang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Physiological and subjective comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a cooling environment.

Authors:  Kaori Tamura; Sayaka Matsumoto; Yu Hsuan Tseng; Takayuki Kobayashi; Jun'ichi Miwa; Ken'ichi Miyazawa; Toyotaka Hirao; Soichiro Matsumoto; Seiji Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Otake; Tsuyoshi Okamoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Physiological comfort evaluation under different airflow directions in a heating environment.

Authors:  Kaori Tamura; Sayaka Matsumoto; Yu Hsuan Tseng; Takayuki Kobayashi; Jun'ichi Miwa; Ken'ichi Miyazawa; Soichiro Matsumoto; Seiji Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Otake; Tsuyoshi Okamoto
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.509

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.