Literature DB >> 1533063

Reliability problems associated with the modified Schöber technique for true lumbar flexion measurement.

S A Miller1, T Mayer, R Cox, R J Gatchel.   

Abstract

The modified Schöber technique, a method for assessing lumbar spine flexion, was subjected to an analysis of reliability. Fifty normal subjects (21 men, 29 women) were evaluated for lumbar flexion mobility using a blind inter-rater "worst case" protocol. Simultaneously, other sources of error affecting test reliability, such as presence of dimples of Venus, relationship of skin distraction to movement of underlying structures, and upper level of Schöber skin landmarks were also considered. Analysis suggested that systematic error can be introduced that adversely affects inter-rater reliability (r = 0.71). Moreover, skin landmarks are inconsistently present, being completely absent in 26% of cases. Skin tends to distract even over completely immobile bony structures (eg, the sacrum), whereas, on average, only 3.5 of the 6 spinal segments (T12-S1) are included in the Schöber technique for purported measurement of "lumbar spine flexion." The utility of this method is questioned on both scientific and clinical grounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1533063     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199203000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  Working postures: a literature review.

Authors:  Edgar Ramos Vieira; Shrawan Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

2.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preliminary study: reliability of the spinal wheel. A novel device to measure spinal postures applied to sitting and standing.

Authors:  Liba Sheeran; Valerie Sparkes; Monica Busse; Robert van Deursen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Do MRI findings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure.

Authors:  Christoph Quack; Peter Schenk; Thomas Laeubli; Susanne Spillmann; Juerg Hodler; Beat A Michel; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Normal motion of the lumbar spine as related to age and gender.

Authors:  J Dvorák; E G Vajda; D Grob; M M Panjabi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Associations between walking time, quadriceps muscle strength and cardiovascular capacity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Anne Marit Mengshoel; Kari Jokstad; Frithjof Bjerkhoel
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Spinal mobility in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: criterion concurrent validity of classic and novel measurements.

Authors:  John Charles Snow; Kyle Simpson; Proton Rahman; Samuel Howarth; Diana De Carvalho
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Vanitha Arumugam; Joshua I Vincent; Kimberly L Payne; Aubrey K So
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The validity of spinal mobility for prediction of functional disability in male patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Azza M Atya
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 10.479

10.  The reliability and validity of the computerized double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility.

Authors:  Joy Christine MacDermid; Vanitha Arumugam; Joshua Israel Vincent; Krista L Carroll
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.