Literature DB >> 15329106

Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model.

Mohamed Abdel-Khalek1, Mahmoud El-Baz, El-Houssieny Ibrahiem.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the importance of extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and to define predictors of cancer in extended biopsy in patients with HGPIN, using multivariate analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 83 patients with previous sextant biopsy of HGPIN had an extended 11-core biopsy taken. Patients with a negative biopsy for cancer were followed by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) every 6 months. The extended biopsy was repeated in 21 patients. The criteria for second biopsy were an increase in PSA and/or abnormal changes on DRE. Overall, 49 patients had a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The cancer-detection rate on extended biopsy was correlated with risk factors using the chi-square test and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Extended biopsy detected prostate cancer in 30 of the 83 men (36%), with positive cores in only 20 sextant biopsy sites (67%), in only seven in additional sites (23%), and both in three (10%). Of the 21 patients who had repeat extended biopsy, four (19%) had cancers. There were two carcinomas in the 49 TURP specimens (4%). The PSA level, DRE and transrectal ultrasonography findings were not predictive of cancer in extended biopsies (chi-square test). Patient age, PSA density and the number of cores with HGPIN (all P < 0.001) had a significant effect on the cancer-detection rate, and multivariate analysis showed that all three were independent predictors of cancer. A logistic regression model was designed to predict the probability of cancer in extended biopsy, with an overall accuracy of 78%.
CONCLUSION: Extended biopsy improved the cancer detection rate by 23% in patients with HGPIN. Patient age, PSA density and the number of cores with HGPIN were the only independent predictors of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15329106     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04996.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of Prostatic Tissue Processed by Microwave and Conventional Technique Using Morphometry.

Authors:  Promil Jain; Sanjay Kumar; B Arora; Sneh Singh; Sonia Chabbra; Rajeev Sen
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Managing high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical glands on prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ridwan Alam; Mark W Ball; H Ballentine Carter; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation on initial 21-core extended biopsy scheme: incidence and implications for patient care and surveillance.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Gwendoline Plennevaux; Yves Allory; Laurent Salomon; Sandy Azoulay; Dimitri Vordos; Andreas Hoznek; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Subsequent prostate cancer detection in patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation.

Authors:  Moamen M Amin; Suganthiny Jeyaganth; Nader Fahmy; Louis Bégin; Samuel Aronson; Stephen Jacobson; Simon Tanguay; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of the prostate: the precursor lesion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debra L Zynger; Ximing Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-12-22

7.  Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation and High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Should We Be Concerned? An Observational Cohort Study with a Minimum Follow-Up of 3 Years.

Authors:  Vinaya Srirangam; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Ahmed Abroaf; Samita Agarwal; Sergey Tadtayev; Charlotte Foley; Tim Lane; Jim Adshead; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-10-22

8.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Joseph C Klink; Ranko Miocinovic; Cristina Magi Galluzzi; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-05-18

9.  Significance of atypical small acinar proliferation and extensive high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm in clinical practice.

Authors:  Przemysław Adamczyk; Zbigniew Wolski; Romuald Butkiewicz; Joanna Nussbeutel; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-06-23

10.  Multiple cores of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and any core of atypia on first biopsy are significant predictor for cancer detection at a repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Tae Sun Kim; Kwang Jin Ko; Seung Jea Shin; Hyun Soo Ryoo; Wan Song; Hyun Hwan Sung; Deok Hyun Han; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Kyu Sung Lee; Sung Won Lee; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.