Literature DB >> 19373471

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation on initial 21-core extended biopsy scheme: incidence and implications for patient care and surveillance.

Guillaume Ploussard1, Gwendoline Plennevaux, Yves Allory, Laurent Salomon, Sandy Azoulay, Dimitri Vordos, Andreas Hoznek, Claude-Clément Abbou, Alexandre de la Taille.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) in an initial 21-core extended biopsy scheme and to determine the prostate cancer detection rate in the repeated biopsy.
METHODS: Between 2002 and 2008, 2,006 patients underwent a first 21-core extended biopsy scheme. Incidences of cancer, ASAP and HGPIN were studied. Cancer detection rate in the repeated 21-core extended biopsy for ASAP and HGPIN was reported and compared with those obtained on repeated biopsy for clinico-biological indications.
RESULTS: Incidences of HGPIN and ASAP were 1.7 and 1.1%, respectively. The 6-core and 12-core biopsy schemes detecting HGPIN would have missed the diagnosis of cancer in 10 and 3.6% of cases, compared to a 21-core biopsy protocol, respectively. The cancer detection rate on repeated biopsy for HGPIN was 19% and not significantly different compared with the detection rate on repeated biopsy for clinico-biological indications (16.8%, p = 0.77). Seven prostate cancers were found among the 17 re-biopsies for ASAP revealing a detection rate of 41.2% (p = 0.01). All detected cancers were organ confined. No clinico-pathological data were independent predictor of cancer on repeated biopsy.
CONCLUSION: Our report demonstrates the different risk profiles for HGPIN and ASAP in a 21-core extended biopsy scheme. The presence of HGPIN does not imply a higher risk for cancer detection at immediate re-biopsy compared to other patients for whom repeated biopsies were indicated for increasing or persistently increased PSA levels. Repeated biopsy is warranted when ASAP is diagnosed because of a high risk of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19373471      PMCID: PMC2825569          DOI: 10.1007/s00345-009-0413-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  22 in total

Review 1.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): importance and clinical management.

Authors:  S Joniau; L Goeman; J Pennings; H Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era.

Authors:  Courtenay K Moore; Shridevi Karikehalli; Tipu Nazeer; Hugh A G Fisher; Ronald P Kaufman; Badar M Mian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  The relationship between prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer: critical issues.

Authors:  M J Häggman; J A Macoska; K J Wojno; J E Oesterling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Atypical foci suspicious but not diagnostic of malignancy in prostate needle biopsies (also referred to as "atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy").

Authors:  Rodolfo Montironi; Vincenzo Scattoni; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; David G Bostwick; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation: predictive value for cancer in current practice.

Authors:  Cory Schlesinger; David G Bostwick; Kenneth A Iczkowski
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy as risk factor for detection of adenocarcinoma: current level of risk in screening population.

Authors:  Neriman Gokden; Kimberly A Roehl; William J Catalona; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled.

Authors:  Mehsati Herawi; Hillel Kahane; Christina Cavallo; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Diagnosis of "suspicious for malignancy" in prostate biopsies: predictive value for cancer.

Authors:  K A Iczkowski; T J Bassler; V S Schwob; I C Bassler; B S Kunnel; R E Orozco; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Mehsati Herawi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and the origins of prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.250

View more
  7 in total

1.  The impact of African American race on prostate cancer detection on repeat prostate biopsy in a veteran population.

Authors:  William A Sterling; Joseph Weiner; David Schreiber; Komal Mehta; Jeffrey P Weiss
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP): Is a repeat biopsy necessary ASAP? A multi-institutional review.

Authors:  A Leone; B Gershman; K Rotker; C Butler; J Fantasia; A Miller; A Afiadata; A Amin; A Zhou; Z Jiang; T Sebo; A Mega; S Schiff; G Pareek; D Golijanin; J Yates; R J Karnes; J Renzulli
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Atypical small acinar proliferation at index prostate biopsy: rethinking the re-biopsy paradigm.

Authors:  Leslie A Ynalvez; Christopher D Kosarek; Preston S Kerr; Ali M Mahmoud; Eduardo J Eyzaguirre; Eduardo Orihuela; Joseph N Sonstein; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Pathologic results of radical prostatectomies in patients with simultaneous atypical small acinar proliferation and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kwang Ho Kim; Yun Beom Kim; Jeong Kee Lee; Yoon Jung Kim; Tae Young Jung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-06-21

5.  What is the ideal core number for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Renato Caretta Chambó; Fábio Hissachi Tsuji; Flávio de Oliveira Lima; Hamilto Akihissa Yamamoto; Carlos Márcio Nóbrega de Jesus
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-11-04

6.  Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: Repeat Biopsy and Detection of High Grade Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Leone; Katherine Rotker; Christi Butler; Anthony Mega; Jianhong Li; Ali Amin; Stephen F Schiff; Gyan Pareek; Dragan Golijanin; Joseph F Renzulli
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2015-09-14

7.  Molecular Targeted Therapies Using Botanicals for Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention.

Authors:  Nagi Kumar; Ganna Chornokur
Journal:  Transl Med (Sunnyvale)       Date:  2012-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.