Literature DB >> 15326485

TGF-beta and HGF transmit the signals through JNK-dependent Smad2/3 phosphorylation at the linker regions.

Shigeo Mori1, Koichi Matsuzaki, Katsunori Yoshida, Fukiko Furukawa, Yoshiya Tahashi, Hideo Yamagata, Go Sekimoto, Toshihito Seki, Hirofumi Matsui, Mikio Nishizawa, Jun-ichi Fujisawa, Kazuichi Okazaki.   

Abstract

Although hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) can act synergistically or antagonistically with transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling, molecular mechanism of their crosstalk remains unknown. Using antibodies which selectively distinguished receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads) phosphorylated at linker regions from those at C-terminal regions, we herein showed that either HGF or TGF-beta treatment of normal stomach-origin cells activated the JNK pathway, thereafter inducing endogenous R-Smads phosphorylation at linker regions. However, the phosphorylation at their C-terminal regions was not induced by HGF treatment. The activated JNK could directly phosphorylate R-Smads in vitro at the same sites that were phosphorylated in response to TGF-beta or HGF in vivo. Thus, the linker regions of R-Smads were the common phosphorylation sites for HGF and TGF-beta signaling pathways. The phosphorylation induced by simultaneous treatment with HGF and TGF-beta allowed R-Smads to associate with Smad4 and to translocate into the nucleus. JNK pathway involved HGF and TGF-beta-mediated infiltration potency since a JNK inhibitor SP600125 caused the reduction of invasive capacity induced by HGF and TGF-beta signals. Moreover, a combined treatment with HGF and TGF-beta led to a potent increase in plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 transcriptional activity through Smad3 phosphorylation at the linker region. In contrast, HGF treatment reduced TGF-beta-dependent activation of p15INK4B promoter, in which Smad3 phosphorylation at the C-terminal region was involved. In conclusion, HGF and TGF-beta transmit the signals through JNK-mediated R-Smads phosphorylation at linker regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15326485     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  81 in total

1.  Long-chain Acyl-CoA synthetase 4A regulates Smad activity and dorsoventral patterning in the zebrafish embryo.

Authors:  Rosa Linda Miyares; Cornelia Stein; Björn Renisch; Jennifer Lynn Anderson; Matthias Hammerschmidt; Steven Arthur Farber
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  The Smad3 linker region contains a transcriptional activation domain.

Authors:  Guannan Wang; Jianyin Long; Isao Matsuura; Dongming He; Fang Liu
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Smad3 reduces susceptibility to hepatocarcinoma by sensitizing hepatocytes to apoptosis through downregulation of Bcl-2.

Authors:  Yu-An Yang; Gen-Mu Zhang; Lionel Feigenbaum; Ying E Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Flow-dependent Smad2 phosphorylation and TGIF nuclear localization in human aortic endothelial cells.

Authors:  Robert D Shepherd; Stephanie M Kos; Kristina D Rinker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  The prognostic significance of Smad3, Smad4, Smad3 phosphoisoform expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Soo Youn Cho; Sang Yun Ha; Song-Mei Huang; Jeong Hoon Kim; Myung Soo Kang; Hae-Yong Yoo; Hyeon-ho Kim; Cheol-Keun Park; Sung-Hee Um; Kyung-Hee Kim; Seok-Hyung Kim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  MAPK inhibitors differently modulate TGF-β/Smad signaling in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  A Boye; H Kan; C Wu; Y Jiang; X Yang; S He; Y Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-07

Review 7.  Smad3 phospho-isoform signaling in hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Takashi Yamaguchi; Katsunori Yoshida; Miki Murata; Koichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  To (TGF)beta or not to (TGF)beta: fine-tuning of Smad signaling via post-translational modifications.

Authors:  Katharine H Wrighton; Xin-Hua Feng
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.315

9.  Transforming growth factor-{beta}-inducible phosphorylation of Smad3.

Authors:  Guannan Wang; Isao Matsuura; Dongming He; Fang Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Molecular Pathways: Cachexia Signaling-A Targeted Approach to Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Yuji Miyamoto; Diana L Hanna; Wu Zhang; Hideo Baba; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.