Literature DB >> 19218245

Transforming growth factor-{beta}-inducible phosphorylation of Smad3.

Guannan Wang1, Isao Matsuura, Dongming He, Fang Liu.   

Abstract

Smad proteins transduce the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signal at the cell surface into gene regulation in the nucleus. Upon TGF-beta treatment, the highly homologous Smad2 and Smad3 are phosphorylated by the TGF-beta receptor at the SSXS motif in the C-terminal tail. Here we show that in addition to the C-tail, three (S/T)-P sites in the Smad3 linker region, Ser(208), Ser(204), and Thr(179) are phosphorylated in response to TGF-beta. The linker phosphorylation peaks at 1 h after TGF-beta treatment, behind the peak of the C-tail phosphorylation. We provide evidence suggesting that the C-tail phosphorylation by the TGF-beta receptor is necessary for the TGF-beta-induced linker phosphorylation. Although the TGF-beta receptor is necessary for the linker phosphorylation, the receptor itself does not phosphorylate these sites. We further show that ERK is not responsible for TGF-beta-dependent phosphorylation of these three sites. We show that GSK3 accounts for TGF-beta-inducible Ser(204) phosphorylation. Flavopiridol, a pan-CDK inhibitor, abolishes TGF-beta-induced phosphorylation of Thr(179) and Ser(208), suggesting that the CDK family is responsible for phosphorylation of Thr(179) and Ser(208) in response to TGF-beta. Mutation of the linker phosphorylation sites to nonphosphorylatable residues increases the ability of Smad3 to activate a TGF-beta/Smad-target gene as well as the growth-inhibitory function of Smad3. Thus, these observations suggest that TGF-beta-induced phosphorylation of Smad3 linker sites inhibits its antiproliferative activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19218245      PMCID: PMC2665087          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M809281200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  75 in total

1.  In vivo convergence of BMP and MAPK signaling pathways: impact of differential Smad1 phosphorylation on development and homeostasis.

Authors:  Josée Aubin; Alice Davy; Philippe Soriano
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Mammalian cells cycle without the D-type cyclin-dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6.

Authors:  Marcos Malumbres; Rocío Sotillo; David Santamaría; Javier Galán; Ana Cerezo; Sagrario Ortega; Pierre Dubus; Mariano Barbacid
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Wagging the dogma; tissue-specific cell cycle control in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Michele Pagano; Peter K Jackson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Transforming growth factor beta activation of p44mapk in proliferating cultures of epithelial cells.

Authors:  M T Hartsough; K M Mulder
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-03-31       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  TGF-beta and HGF transmit the signals through JNK-dependent Smad2/3 phosphorylation at the linker regions.

Authors:  Shigeo Mori; Koichi Matsuzaki; Katsunori Yoshida; Fukiko Furukawa; Yoshiya Tahashi; Hideo Yamagata; Go Sekimoto; Toshihito Seki; Hirofumi Matsui; Mikio Nishizawa; Jun-ichi Fujisawa; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Cyclin-dependent kinases regulate the antiproliferative function of Smads.

Authors:  Isao Matsuura; Natalia G Denissova; Guannan Wang; Dongming He; Jianyin Long; Fang Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mouse development and cell proliferation in the absence of D-cyclins.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kozar; Maria A Ciemerych; Vivienne I Rebel; Hirokazu Shigematsu; Agnieszka Zagozdzon; Ewa Sicinska; Yan Geng; Qunyan Yu; Shoumo Bhattacharya; Roderick T Bronson; Koichi Akashi; Piotr Sicinski
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Dorsal-ventral patterning and neural induction in Xenopus embryos.

Authors:  Edward M De Robertis; Hiroki Kuroda
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.827

9.  Axin and GSK3- control Smad3 protein stability and modulate TGF- signaling.

Authors:  Xing Guo; Alejandro Ramirez; David S Waddell; Zhizhong Li; Xuedong Liu; Xiao-Fan Wang
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Potent inhibition of CDC2 kinase activity by the flavonoid L86-8275.

Authors:  M D Losiewicz; B A Carlson; G Kaur; E A Sausville; P J Worland
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  66 in total

Review 1.  Smad linker region phosphorylation in the regulation of extracellular matrix synthesis.

Authors:  Micah L Burch; Wenhua Zheng; Peter J Little
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Aberrant hypertrophy in Smad3-deficient murine chondrocytes is rescued by restoring transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1/activating transcription factor 2 signaling: a potential clinical implication for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Tian-Fang Li; Lin Gao; Tzong-Jen Sheu; Erik R Sampson; Lisa M Flick; Yrjö T Konttinen; Di Chen; Edward M Schwarz; Michael J Zuscik; Jennifer H Jonason; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-08

3.  Bone morphogenetic protein 4 promotes mammalian oogonial stem cell differentiation via Smad1/5/8 signaling.

Authors:  Eun-Sil Park; Dori C Woods; Jonathan L Tilly
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  [Tumor necrosis factor-α and transforming growth factor-β1 balance liver stem cell differentiation in cholestatic cirrhosis].

Authors:  Bo Yang; Qing Luo; Quan Kang; Jian Wang; Cheng Xiao; Zhi-Peng Li; Meng-Jia Gong; Yang Bi
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-04-20

5.  The prognostic significance of Smad3, Smad4, Smad3 phosphoisoform expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Soo Youn Cho; Sang Yun Ha; Song-Mei Huang; Jeong Hoon Kim; Myung Soo Kang; Hae-Yong Yoo; Hyeon-ho Kim; Cheol-Keun Park; Sung-Hee Um; Kyung-Hee Kim; Seok-Hyung Kim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Src is a major signaling component for CTGF induction by TGF-beta1 in osteoblasts.

Authors:  X Zhang; J A Arnott; S Rehman; W G Delong; A Sanjay; F F Safadi; S N Popoff
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 7.  Entanglement of GSK-3β, β-catenin and TGF-β1 signaling network to regulate myocardial fibrosis.

Authors:  Yuanjun Guo; Manisha Gupte; Prachi Umbarkar; Anand Prakash Singh; Jennifer Y Sui; Thomas Force; Hind Lal
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  Smad2 and PEA3 cooperatively regulate transcription of response gene to complement 32 in TGF-β-induced smooth muscle cell differentiation of neural crest cells.

Authors:  Wen-Yan Huang; Weibing Xie; Xia Guo; Fengmin Li; Pedro A Jose; Shi-You Chen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 9.  TGF-β Signaling from Receptors to Smads.

Authors:  Akiko Hata; Ye-Guang Chen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  Rewiring of the apoptotic TGF-β-SMAD/NFκB pathway through an oncogenic function of p27 in human papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  A R Garcia-Rendueles; J S Rodrigues; M E R Garcia-Rendueles; M Suarez-Fariña; S Perez-Romero; F Barreiro; I Bernabeu; J Rodriguez-Garcia; L Fugazzola; T Sakai; F Liu; J Cameselle-Teijeiro; S B Bravo; C V Alvarez
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.