Literature DB >> 15326126

Appearance of the pattern deviation map as a function of change in area of localized field loss.

Peter Asman1, John M Wild, Anders Heijl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of the spatial extent and the depth of localized field loss on the computation of the General Height (GH) method for estimating the diffuse component of visual field loss and, therefore, on the subsequent appearance of the Pattern Deviation (PD) map.
METHODS: Varying shapes and depths of localized glaucomatous field loss were modeled in each of 82 Humphrey Field Analyzer Program 30-2 fields (82 normal eyes) by superimposing, on the fields from the normal eyes, the PD defect depth (P < 0.05) of one visual field from each of 123 patients with glaucoma. The difference in GH between each of the 10,086 modeled fields and the GH in the corresponding measured normal field was derived and the relationship to possible differences in the location-by-location significance levels of each pair of PD maps determined.
RESULTS: For the group mean overestimation in the GH of -0.79 dB, the 50th, 90th, and 95th percentiles of the modeled fields described 23.4%, 37.9%, and 42.6% locations, respectively, exhibiting an underestimation in PD statistical significance. As the size of the superimposed field loss increased, the overestimation of the GH increased, and the underestimation of PD statistical significance became more apparent. This error was independent of defect depth.
CONCLUSIONS: The localized component of field loss in glaucoma produced an overestimation of diffuse loss and a consequent underestimation of the severity of focal loss by PD analysis. This effect increased as the spatial extent of the loss became more extensive and will lead to an underestimation of progressive localized field loss. Copyright Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15326126     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  8 in total

1.  Stabilization and comparison of TOP and Bracketing perimetric strategies using a threshold spatial filter.

Authors:  Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa; Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez; Tinguaro Diaz Aleman; Manuel Sanchez Mendez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma with standard achromatic perimetry: a review and practical implications.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Nariman Nassiri; Annette Giangiacomo; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A novel strategy for the estimation of the general height of the visual field in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Iván Marín-Franch; William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population.

Authors:  Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Pilar Casas-Llera; Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete; Gema Rebolleda
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Primary visual cortical thickness in correlation with visual field defects in patients with pituitary macroadenomas: a structural 7-Tesla retinotopic analysis.

Authors:  John W Rutland; Bradley N Delman; Kuang-Han Huang; Gaurav Verma; Noah C Benson; Dillan F Villavisanis; Hung-Mo Lin; Joshua B Bederson; James Chelnis; Raj K Shrivastava; Priti Balchandani
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Functional characteristics of glaucoma related arcuate defects seen on OCT en face visualisation of the retinal nerve fibre layer.

Authors:  Bright S Ashimatey; Brett J King; William H Swanson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Microperimetry in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Evidence-Base for Pattern Deviation Probability Analysis in Microperimetry.

Authors:  Nicola K Cassels; John M Wild; Tom H Margrain; Chris Blyth; Victor Chong; Jennifer H Acton
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Clinical Evaluations of Macular Structure-Function Concordance With and Without Drasdo Displacement.

Authors:  Janelle Tong; Jack Phu; David Alonso-Caneiro; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.048

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.