Peter Asman1, John M Wild, Anders Heijl. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. peter.asman@oftal.mas.lu.se
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the influence of the spatial extent and the depth of localized field loss on the computation of the General Height (GH) method for estimating the diffuse component of visual field loss and, therefore, on the subsequent appearance of the Pattern Deviation (PD) map. METHODS: Varying shapes and depths of localized glaucomatous field loss were modeled in each of 82 Humphrey Field Analyzer Program 30-2 fields (82 normal eyes) by superimposing, on the fields from the normal eyes, the PD defect depth (P < 0.05) of one visual field from each of 123 patients with glaucoma. The difference in GH between each of the 10,086 modeled fields and the GH in the corresponding measured normal field was derived and the relationship to possible differences in the location-by-location significance levels of each pair of PD maps determined. RESULTS: For the group mean overestimation in the GH of -0.79 dB, the 50th, 90th, and 95th percentiles of the modeled fields described 23.4%, 37.9%, and 42.6% locations, respectively, exhibiting an underestimation in PD statistical significance. As the size of the superimposed field loss increased, the overestimation of the GH increased, and the underestimation of PD statistical significance became more apparent. This error was independent of defect depth. CONCLUSIONS: The localized component of field loss in glaucoma produced an overestimation of diffuse loss and a consequent underestimation of the severity of focal loss by PD analysis. This effect increased as the spatial extent of the loss became more extensive and will lead to an underestimation of progressive localized field loss. Copyright Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
PURPOSE: To determine the influence of the spatial extent and the depth of localized field loss on the computation of the General Height (GH) method for estimating the diffuse component of visual field loss and, therefore, on the subsequent appearance of the Pattern Deviation (PD) map. METHODS: Varying shapes and depths of localized glaucomatous field loss were modeled in each of 82 Humphrey Field Analyzer Program 30-2 fields (82 normal eyes) by superimposing, on the fields from the normal eyes, the PD defect depth (P < 0.05) of one visual field from each of 123 patients with glaucoma. The difference in GH between each of the 10,086 modeled fields and the GH in the corresponding measured normal field was derived and the relationship to possible differences in the location-by-location significance levels of each pair of PD maps determined. RESULTS: For the group mean overestimation in the GH of -0.79 dB, the 50th, 90th, and 95th percentiles of the modeled fields described 23.4%, 37.9%, and 42.6% locations, respectively, exhibiting an underestimation in PD statistical significance. As the size of the superimposed field loss increased, the overestimation of the GH increased, and the underestimation of PD statistical significance became more apparent. This error was independent of defect depth. CONCLUSIONS: The localized component of field loss in glaucoma produced an overestimation of diffuse loss and a consequent underestimation of the severity of focal loss by PD analysis. This effect increased as the spatial extent of the loss became more extensive and will lead to an underestimation of progressive localized field loss. Copyright Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Authors: Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa; Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez; Tinguaro Diaz Aleman; Manuel Sanchez Mendez Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2007-02-07 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: John W Rutland; Bradley N Delman; Kuang-Han Huang; Gaurav Verma; Noah C Benson; Dillan F Villavisanis; Hung-Mo Lin; Joshua B Bederson; James Chelnis; Raj K Shrivastava; Priti Balchandani Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Nicola K Cassels; John M Wild; Tom H Margrain; Chris Blyth; Victor Chong; Jennifer H Acton Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Janelle Tong; Jack Phu; David Alonso-Caneiro; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Kalloniatis Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.048