Literature DB >> 15325089

Genetic diagnosis by comparative genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia.

Sílvia Casas1, Anna Aventín, Francisca Fuentes, Teresa Vallespí, Isabel Granada, Anna Carrió, José Angel Martínez-Climent, Francesc Solé, Montserrat Teixidó, Marta Bernués, José Duarte, Jesús Maria Hernández, Salut Brunet, Maria Dolors Coll, Jorge Sierra.   

Abstract

A total of 127 adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) patients were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) at diagnosis. Conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA) showed a normal karyotype in 45 cases and an abnormal karyotype in 56 cases; in the remaining cases, CCA either failed to yield sufficient metaphase cells (19/26) or was not done (7/26). Abnormal CGH profiles were identified in 39 patients (30.7%). DNA copy number losses (61%) were high compared to gains (39%), whereas partial chromosome changes (76%) were more common than whole chromosomes changes (24%). Recurrent losses were detected on chromosomes 7, 5q (comprising bands 5q15 to 5q33), 7q (7q32 approximately q36), 16q (16q13 approximately q21), and 17p, and gains were detected on chromosomes 8, 22, and 3q (comprising bands 3q26.1 approximately q27). Furthermore, distinct amplifications were identified in chromosome regions 21q, 13q12 approximately q13, and 13q21.1. No cryptic recurrent chromosomal imbalances were identified by CGH in cases with normal karyotypes. The concordance between CGH results and CCA was 72.5%. In the remaining cases, CGH gave additional information compared to CCA (20%) and partially failed to identify the alterations previously detected by CCA (7.5%). The majority of discrepancies arose from the limitations of the CGH technique, such as insensitivity to detect unbalanced chromosomal changes when occurring in a low proportion of cells. CGH increased the detection of unbalanced chromosomal alterations and allowed precise defining of partial or uncharacterized cytogenetical abnormalities. Application of the CGH technique is thus a useful complementary diagnostic tool for CCA in de novo AML cases with abnormal karyotypes or with unsuccessful cytogenetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15325089     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2003.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  10 in total

1.  Acquired genomic copy number aberrations and survival in adult acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Brian Parkin; Harry Erba; Peter Ouillette; Diane Roulston; Anjali Purkayastha; Judith Karp; Moshe Talpaz; Lisa Kujawski; Sajid Shakhan; Cheng Li; Kerby Shedden; Sami N Malek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Cytogenetic, molecular genetic, and clinical characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia with a complex karyotype.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  The p53 target Wig-1: a regulator of mRNA stability and stem cell fate?

Authors:  A Vilborg; C Bersani; M T Wilhelm; K G Wiman
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  Identification of clinically important chromosomal aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Meenakshi Mehrotra; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Farhad Ravandi; Rachel L Sargent; Bedia A Barkoh; Ronald Abraham; Bal Mukund Mishra; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Keyur P Patel
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-11

5.  Molecular characterisation of the pericentric inversion that distinguishes human chromosome 5 from the homologous chimpanzee chromosome.

Authors:  Justyna M Szamalek; Violaine Goidts; Nadia Chuzhanova; Horst Hameister; David N Cooper; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Clinical relevance of mutations and gene-expression changes in adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics: are we ready for a prognostically prioritized molecular classification?

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek; Guido Marcucci; Peter Paschka; Susan P Whitman; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Challenging conventional karyotyping by next-generation karyotyping in 281 intensively treated patients with AML.

Authors:  Sylvain Mareschal; Anna Palau; Johan Lindberg; Philippe Ruminy; Christer Nilsson; Sofia Bengtzén; Marie Engvall; Anna Eriksson; Anne Neddermeyer; Vinciane Marchand; Monika Jansson; My Björklund; Fabrice Jardin; Mattias Rantalainen; Andreas Lennartsson; Lucia Cavelier; Henrik Grönberg; Sören Lehmann
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 8.  Genomic analysis of acute myeloid leukemia: potential for new prognostic indicators.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Eklund
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.284

9.  Genomic Copy Number Variations in the Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with del(5q) and/or -7/del(7q).

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Young-Mi Kim; Xianfu Wang; Yan Li; Xianglan Lu; Andrea R Sternenberger; Shibo Li; Ji-Yun Lee
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Acute myeloid leukaemia: a paradigm for the clonal evolution of cancer?

Authors:  Carolyn S Grove; George S Vassiliou
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.758

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.