Literature DB >> 8935899

Accuracy and adaptation of reaching and pointing in pitched visual environments.

R B Welch1, R B Post.   

Abstract

Visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and the ability of subjects to reach with an unseen limb to targets placed at VPEL were measured in a statically pitched visual surround (pitchroom). VPEL was shifted upward and downward by upward and downward room pitch, respectively. Accuracy in reaching to VPEL represented a compromise between VPEL and actual eye level. This indicates that VPEL shifts reflect in part a change in perceived location of objects. When subjects were provided with terminal visual feedback about their reaching, accuracy improved rapidly. Subsequent reaching, with the room vertical, revealed a negative aftereffect (i.e., reaching errors that were opposite those made initially in the pitched room). In a second study, pointing accuracy was assessed for targets located both at VPEL and at other positions. Errors were similar for targets whether located at VPEL or elsewhere. Additionally, pointing responses were restricted to a narrower range than that of the actual target locations. The small size of reaching and pointing errors in both studies suggests that factors other than a change in perceived location are also involved in VPEL shifts.

Keywords:  NASA Center ARC; NASA Discipline Neuroscience

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8935899     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field.

Authors:  L Matin; W X Li
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields.

Authors:  H A WITKIN; S E ASCH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-12

3.  Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.

Authors:  L Matin; C R Fox
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Oculomotor and skeletal motor systems share one map of visual space.

Authors:  K Nemire; B Bridgeman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Beware of the straight-ahead shift--a nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision.

Authors:  C S Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception.

Authors:  B Bridgeman; S Lewis; G Heit; M Nagle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level.

Authors:  A E Stoper; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

8.  Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane.

Authors:  K Nemire; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-01

9.  Absence of relational determination in the rod-and-frame effect.

Authors:  S M Ebenholtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

10.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion.

Authors:  B Bridgemen; M Kirch; A Sperling
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-04
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reduction of the elevator illusion from continued hypergravity exposure and visual error-corrective feedback.

Authors:  R B Welch; M M Cohen; C W DeRoshia
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

2.  Combined influence of visual scene and body tilt on arm pointing movements: gravity matters!

Authors:  Cécile Scotto Di Cesare; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Christophe Bourdin; Daniel R Mestre; Lionel Bringoux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.