Literature DB >> 15321724

Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers.

Kannan Gunasekaran1, Chung-Jung Tsai, Ruth Nussinov.   

Abstract

Most proteins exist in the cell as multi-component assemblies. However, which proteins need to be present simultaneously in order to perform a given function is frequently unknown. The first step toward this goal would be to predict proteins that can function only when in a complexed form. Here, we propose a scheme to distinguish whether the protein components are ordered (stable) or disordered when separated from their complexed partners. We analyze structural characteristics of several types of complexes, such as natively unstructured proteins, ribosomal proteins, two-state and three-state complexes, and crystal-packing dimers. Our analysis makes use of the fact that natively unstructured proteins, which undergo a disorder-to-order transition upon binding their partner, and stable monomeric proteins, which exist as dimers only in their crystal form, provide examples of two vastly different scenarios. We find that ordered monomers can be distinguished from disordered monomers on the basis of the per-residue surface and interface areas, which are significantly smaller for ordered proteins. With this scale, two-state dimers (where the monomers unfold upon dimer separation) and ribosomal proteins are shown to resemble disordered proteins. On the other hand, crystal-packing dimers, whose monomers are stable in solution, fall into the ordered protein category. While there should be a continuum in the distributions, nevertheless, the per-residue scale measures the confidence in the determination of whether a protein can exist as a stable monomer. Further analysis, focusing on the chemical and contact preferences at the interface, interior and exposed surface areas, reveals that disordered proteins lack a strong hydrophobic core and are composed of highly polar surface area. We discuss the implication of our results for de novo design of stable monomeric proteins and peptides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15321724     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  69 in total

1.  MoRFpred, a computational tool for sequence-based prediction and characterization of short disorder-to-order transitioning binding regions in proteins.

Authors:  Fatemeh Miri Disfani; Wei-Lun Hsu; Marcin J Mizianty; Christopher J Oldfield; Bin Xue; A Keith Dunker; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Understanding protein non-folding.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-02-01

3.  Nonlinear protein degradation and the function of genetic circuits.

Authors:  Nicolas E Buchler; Ulrich Gerland; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effect of heat and pH denaturation on the structure and conformation of recombinant human hepatic stimulator substance.

Authors:  Zhi-cheng Yang; Lin Yang; Ying-xia Zhang; He-fen Yu; Wei An
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFs, and their binding partners.

Authors:  Vladimir Vacic; Christopher J Oldfield; Amrita Mohan; Predrag Radivojac; Marc S Cortese; Vladimir N Uversky; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Between order and disorder in protein structures: analysis of "dual personality" fragments in proteins.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Boguslaw Stec; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Quantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition.

Authors:  Xiakun Chu; Linfeng Gan; Erkang Wang; Jin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Large-scale analysis of intrinsic disorder flavors and associated functions in the protein sequence universe.

Authors:  Marco Necci; Damiano Piovesan; Silvio C E Tosatto
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Where differences resemble: sequence-feature analysis in curated databases of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Marco Necci; Damiano Piovesan; Silvio C E Tosatto
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Protein charge and mass contribute to the spatio-temporal dynamics of protein-protein interactions in a minimal proteome.

Authors:  Yu Xu; Hong Wang; Ruth Nussinov; Buyong Ma
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.