Literature DB >> 23754431

Quantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition.

Xiakun Chu1, Linfeng Gan, Erkang Wang, Jin Wang.   

Abstract

Biomolecular functions are determined by their interactions with other molecules. Biomolecular recognition is often flexible and associated with large conformational changes involving both binding and folding. However, the global and physical understanding for the process is still challenging. Here, we quantified the intrinsic energy landscapes of flexible biomolecular recognition in terms of binding-folding dynamics for 15 homodimers by exploring the underlying density of states, using a structure-based model both with and without considering energetic roughness. By quantifying three individual effective intrinsic energy landscapes (one for interfacial binding, two for monomeric folding), the association mechanisms for flexible recognition of 15 homodimers can be classified into two-state cooperative "coupled binding-folding" and three-state noncooperative "folding prior to binding" scenarios. We found that the association mechanism of flexible biomolecular recognition relies on the interplay between the underlying effective intrinsic binding and folding energy landscapes. By quantifying the whole global intrinsic binding-folding energy landscapes, we found strong correlations between the landscape topography measure Λ (dimensionless ratio of energy gap versus roughness modulated by the configurational entropy) and the ratio of the thermodynamic stable temperature versus trapping temperature, as well as between Λ and binding kinetics. Therefore, the global energy landscape topography determines the binding-folding thermodynamics and kinetics, crucial for the feasibility and efficiency of realizing biomolecular function. We also found "U-shape" temperature-dependent kinetic behavior and a dynamical cross-over temperature for dividing exponential and nonexponential kinetics for two-state homodimers. Our study provides a unique way to bridge the gap between theory and experiments.

Keywords:  energy landscape theory; flexible binding-folding; intrinsically disordered proteins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23754431      PMCID: PMC3696809          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1220699110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  61 in total

Review 1.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.

Authors:  P E Wright; H J Dyson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Understanding protein folding with energy landscape theory. Part I: Basic concepts.

Authors:  Steven S Plotkin; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 3.  Recent successes of the energy landscape theory of protein folding and function.

Authors:  P G Wolynes
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.318

4.  Quantifying intrinsic specificity: a potential complement to affinity in drug screening.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Xiliang Zheng; Yongliang Yang; Dale Drueckhammer; Wei Yang; Gennardy Verkhivker; Erkang Wang
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Electrostatic effects on funneled landscapes and structural diversity in denatured protein ensembles.

Authors:  Patrick Weinkam; Ekaterina V Pletneva; Harry B Gray; Jay R Winkler; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Topography of funneled landscapes determines the thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ronaldo J Oliveira; Xiakun Chu; Paul C Whitford; Jorge Chahine; Wei Han; Erkang Wang; José N Onuchic; Vitor B P Leite
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Capillarity theory for the fly-casting mechanism.

Authors:  Emmanuel Trizac; Yaakov Levy; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  How, when and why proteins collapse: the relation to folding.

Authors:  Gilad Haran
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Importance of electrostatic interactions in the association of intrinsically disordered histone chaperone Chz1 and histone H2A.Z-H2B.

Authors:  Xiakun Chu; Yong Wang; Linfeng Gan; Yawen Bai; Wei Han; Erkang Wang; Jin Wang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  28 in total

1.  Interrogating the activities of conformational deformed enzyme by single-molecule fluorescence-magnetic tweezers microscopy.

Authors:  Qing Guo; Yufan He; H Peter Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein recognition and selection through conformational and mutually induced fit.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Pengzhi Zhang; Laurel Hoffman; Swarnendu Tripathi; Dirar Homouz; Yin Liu; M Neal Waxham; Margaret S Cheung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  SPA-LN: a scoring function of ligand-nucleic acid interactions via optimizing both specificity and affinity.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Yan; Jin Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Quantifying Nonnative Interactions in the Protein-Folding Free-Energy Landscape.

Authors:  Paulo Ricardo Mouro; Vinícius de Godoi Contessoto; Jorge Chahine; Ronaldo Junio de Oliveira; Vitor Barbanti Pereira Leite
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Conformational frustration in calmodulin-target recognition.

Authors:  Swarnendu Tripathi; Qian Wang; Pengzhi Zhang; Laurel Hoffman; M Neal Waxham; Margaret S Cheung
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.137

7.  The free energy landscape in translational science: how can somatic mutations result in constitutive oncogenic activation?

Authors:  Chung-Jung Tsai; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.676

8.  Conformational state switching and pathways of chromosome dynamics in cell cycle.

Authors:  Xiakun Chu; Jin Wang
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 19.162

9.  Investigating the trade-off between folding and function in a multidomain Y-family DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Xiakun Chu; Zucai Suo; Jin Wang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Efficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets.

Authors:  Nicholas A Marze; Shourya S Roy Burman; William Sheffler; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.