Literature DB >> 15320956

Escitalopram dose-response revisited: an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of escitalopram compared to citalopram and placebo in patients with major depression.

Per Bech1, Per Tanghøj, Philippe Cialdella, Henning Friis Andersen, Anders Gersel Pedersen.   

Abstract

In continuation of a previous psychometric analysis of dose-response data for citalopram in depression, the corresponding study data for escitalopram is of interest, since escitalopram is the active enantiomer of citalopram and because citalopram was used as the active control. Revisiting those corresponding data, the psychometric properties of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) were investigated by focusing on the unidimensional HAMD6 and MADRS6. Effect sizes were calculated and compared for two dosages of escitalopram (10 mg and 20 mg daily) and between each of these two dosages and 40 mg citalopram daily. The results showed that the three depression scales MADRS6, MADRS10 and HAMD6 were psychometrically acceptable (coefficient of homogeneity of 0.40 or higher). In the severely depressed patients (MADRS10> or =30) a rather clear dose-response relationship for escitalopram was seen on all three scales after 6 and 8 wk of therapy. Thus, the effect size for 10 mg escitalopram ranged from 0.28 to 0.38 while the effect sizes for 20 mg escitalopram ranged from 0.57 to 0.77. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). The effect size for 40 mg citalopram ranged from 0.36 to 0.47, which is within the range found for 40 mg citalopram in our previous dose-response analysis of citalopram after 6 wk of therapy. The numerically largest difference between 20 mg escitalopram and 40 mg citalopram was seen after 8 wk of therapy for MADRS10 (effect size 0.71 vs. 0.37). An item analysis identified 'suicidal thoughts' to be the most discriminating item in this respect. These results for the severely depressed patients were confirmed by the patients self-reported quality of life evaluation. When all included patients were analysed, however, no clear dose-response relationship was seen. In conclusion, a dose-response relationship for escitalopram was seen in the severely depressed patients on all outcome scales after 6 and 8 wk of treatment. After 8 wk of treatment 20 mg escitalopram was superior to 40 mg citalopram, but not after 2 wk of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15320956     DOI: 10.1017/S1461145704004365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 1461-1457            Impact factor:   5.176


  20 in total

Review 1.  Social functioning: should it become an endpoint in trials of antidepressants?

Authors:  Per Bech
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Depression severity and concentration difficulties are independently associated with HRQOL in patients with unipolar depressive disorders.

Authors:  A Fattori; L Neri; A Bellomo; M Vaggi; C Mencacci
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sidney H Kennedy; Henning F Andersen; Raymond W Lam
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  General and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders: a report by the WPA section of pharmacopsychiatry.

Authors:  Thomas C Baghai; Pierre Blier; David S Baldwin; Michael Bauer; Guy M Goodwin; Kostas N Fountoulakis; Siegfried Kasper; Brian E Leonard; Ulrik F Malt; Dan Stein; Marcio Versiani; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Dose-response relationship of duloxetine in placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Per Bech; Daniel K Kajdasz; Vibeke Porsdal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Escitalopram, an antidepressant with an allosteric effect at the serotonin transporter--a review of current understanding of its mechanism of action.

Authors:  Huailing Zhong; Nasser Haddjeri; Connie Sánchez
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Escitalopram: a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  David Murdoch; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Early onset of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant action: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Taylor; Nick Freemantle; John R Geddes; Zubin Bhagwagar
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2006-11

9.  Prediction of clinical response based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models of 5-hydroxytryptamine reuptake inhibitors in mice.

Authors:  M Kreilgaard; D G Smith; L T Brennum; C Sánchez
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Immunoregulation and antidepressant effect of ketamine.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Lihua Yao; Peilin Wang; Zhongchun Liu
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 1.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.