Literature DB >> 15319392

What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten.

A Tiitinen1, C Hydén-Granskog, M Gissler.   

Abstract

The most relevant standard of success in IVF has been discussed widely. An optimal standard should reflect both the risk aspects and the effectiveness of the treatment. The most important parameter for the couple is the ultimate cumulative delivery rate per started cycle. Even if the long-term follow-up of the treatment cycles is difficult in practice, we would stress that more emphasis should be given to embryo freezing, in order to maximize the efficiency of the IVF/ICSI cycles. The contribution of embryo cryopreservation in elective single embryo transfer cycle programmes may result in a cumulative delivery rate of >50%. In Finland, the implementation of single embryo transfer has been possible with good cryopreservation programmes. The effect of this strategy has been seen in a decrease in the proportion of twin deliveries after assisted reproduction, being 13.9% for 2002, as well as a reduction of the proportion of multiple births in the nationwide Medical Birth Registry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15319392     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Martin Graham Wilding; Clemente Capobianco; Nadia Montanaro; Genc Kabili; Loredana Di Matteo; Enrico Fusco; Brian Dale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Elective transfer of two embryos: reduction of multiple gestations while maintaining high pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Donna Dowling-Lacey; Estella Jones; Jacob Mayer; Silvina Bocca; Laurel Stadtmauer; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Pregnancy outcome and live birth after IVF and ICSI according to embryo quality.

Authors:  Patricia Fauque; Roger Léandri; Françoise Merlet; Jean-Claude Juillard; Sylvie Epelboin; Juliette Guibert; Pierre Jouannet; Catherine Patrat
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  [In vitro fertilization: a private matter becomes public].

Authors:  Renda Bouzayen; Laura Eggertson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  In vitro fertilization: A private matter becomes public.

Authors:  Renda Bouzayen; Laura Eggertson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Evaluation of possible criteria for elective single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Jun Fukuda; Kyoko Kanamori; Kazuhiro Kawamura; Jin Kumagai; Hideya Kodama; Toshinobu Tanaka
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-02

7.  Anti-mullerian hormone and cumulative pregnancy outcome in in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suresh Kini; H W Raymond Li; Dave Morrell; Sue Pickering; K Joo Thong
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Success of frozen embryo transfer: Does the type of gonadotropin influence the outcome?

Authors:  Hesham Al-Inany; Pieter van Gelder
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 9.  Direct-to-consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: a review of national clinic websites.

Authors:  Jack Wilkinson; Andy Vail; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Patient acceptance of Self-Operated Endovaginal Telemonitoring (SOET): proof of concept.

Authors:  J Gerris; A Geril; P De Sutter
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.