Literature DB >> 15319313

Hemispheric shifts of sound representation in auditory cortex with conceptual listening.

André Brechmann1, Henning Scheich.   

Abstract

The weak field specificity and the heterogeneity of neuronal filters found in any given auditory cortex field does not substantiate the view that such fields are merely descriptive maps of sound features. But field mechanisms were previously shown to support behaviourally relevant classification of sounds. Here the prediction was tested in human auditory cortex (AC) that classification-tasks rather than the stimulus class per se determine which auditory cortex area is recruited. By presenting the same set of frequency-modulations we found that categorization of their pitch direction (rising versus falling) increased functional magnetic resonance imaging activation in right posterior AC compared with stimulus exposure and in contrast to left posterior AC dominance during categorization of their duration (short versus long). Thus, top-down influences appear to select not only auditory cortex areas but also the hemisphere for specific processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15319313     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  45 in total

1.  FM-selective networks in human auditory cortex revealed using fMRI and multivariate pattern classification.

Authors:  I-Hui Hsieh; Paul Fillmore; Feng Rong; Gregory Hickok; Kourosh Saberi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Is my mobile ringing? Evidence for rapid processing of a personally significant sound in humans.

Authors:  Anja Roye; Erich Schröger; Thomas Jacobsen; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective.

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Local and global auditory processing: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Perceptual learning: how much daily training is enough?

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Andrew T Sabin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies.

Authors:  Robert J Zatorre; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Auditory processing disorders with and without central auditory discrimination deficits.

Authors:  Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig; Michael Fuchs; Eberhard Kruse; Brigitte Uhlig; Sonja Annette Kotz; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

9.  Differential dynamic plasticity of A1 receptive fields during multiple spectral tasks.

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Interaction between attention and bottom-up saliency mediates the representation of foreground and background in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Juanjuan Xiang; Shihab A Shamma; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.