Literature DB >> 15319019

Novel strategy for the analysis of CPT data provides new insight into the effects of methylphenidate on attentional states in children with ADHD.

Martin H Teicher1, Steven B Lowen, Ann Polcari, Mary Foley, Cynthia E McGreenery.   

Abstract

Continuous performance tasks (CPTs) provide a method for studying some components of attention, but do not take into account that attention fluctuates from moment to moment. To address this issue, CPT performance was classified into one of four states (on-task, impulsive, distracted, or randomly responding) every 30 seconds, based on commission and omission error rates. We evaluated this method on 60 boys (10.6 +/- 1.1 years) with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-Combined subtype, tested before and after a dose of methylphenidate (MPH, 0.4 mg/kg), and 8 unmedicated healthy control boys (11.3 +/- 2.0 years of age). Healthy controls were on-task during 82.4% of the 30-second epochs, and made an average of 5.4 attention shifts. In contrast, children with ADHD were only on-task during 42.6% of the epochs (p = 0.0006), and they made an average of 12.8 attention shifts (p = 0.00004). These state measures provided more robust indicators of the difference between children with ADHD and controls than did traditional CPT measures of error rates, latency, and variability. The new state measures were also more significantly affected by MPH. MPH produced a 77% increase in the percent of time children with ADHD spent on-task (p < 10(12)). Conversely, MPH reduced time spent in the distracted, impulsive, and random response states by 79%, 44.5%, and 69.2%, respectively (all p values < 0.0002). Unlike errors of omission and commission, which are highly correlated (r = 0.722, n = 60, p < 10(-11)), the percent of epochs spent in impulsive, distracted, and random response states were uncorrelated, and loaded onto discrete independent factors on principal component analysis. The level of activity during the CPT correlated with the degree of distraction, but not with the degree of impulsivity. Children with ADHD could be subtyped according to the nature of their attention performance problems, and these subtypes differed in levels of hyperactivity and degrees of response to MPH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15319019     DOI: 10.1089/1044546041648995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1044-5463            Impact factor:   2.576


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating vigilance deficits in ADHD: a meta-analysis of CPT performance.

Authors:  Cynthia L Huang-Pollock; Sarah L Karalunas; Helen Tam; Amy N Moore
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-03-19

Review 2.  Reaction time variability in ADHD: a review.

Authors:  Leanne Tamm; Megan E Narad; Tanya N Antonini; Kathleen M O'Brien; Larry W Hawk; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Objective assessment of ADHD core symptoms in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.

Authors:  M Alejandra Infante; Eileen M Moore; Tanya T Nguyen; Nikolaos Fourligas; Sarah N Mattson; Edward P Riley
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-10-23

4.  Methylphenidate effects in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: electrodermal and ERP measures during a continuous performance task.

Authors:  Carlie A Lawrence; Robert J Barry; Adam R Clarke; Stuart J Johnstone; Rory McCarthy; Mark Selikowitz; Samantha J Broyd
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of methylphenidate on attention in Wistar rats treated with the neurotoxin N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine (DSP4).

Authors:  Joachim Hauser; Andreas Reissmann; Thomas-A Sontag; Oliver Tucha; Klaus W Lange
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Effects of stimulant medication, incentives, and event rate on reaction time variability in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Jeffery N Epstein; William B Brinkman; Tanya Froehlich; Joshua M Langberg; Megan E Narad; Tanya N Antonini; Keri Shiels; John O Simon; Mekibib Altaye
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Is OPTAx useful for monitoring the effect of stimulants on hyperactivity and inattention? A brief report.

Authors:  Janne Tabori-Kraft; Merete Juul Sørensen; Martin Kaergaard; Søren Dalsgaard; Per Hove Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Utility of objective measures of activity and attention in the assessment of therapeutic response to stimulants in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Martin H Teicher; Ann Polcari; Cynthia E McGreenery
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 9.  Puppets, robots, critics, and actors within a taxonomy of attention for developmental disorders.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis; Katia J Sinopoli; Jack M Fletcher; Russell Schachar
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Correspondence of parent report and laboratory measures of inattention and hyperactivity in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.

Authors:  Leila Glass; Diana M Graham; Benjamin N Deweese; Kenneth Lyons Jones; Edward P Riley; Sarah N Mattson
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.