Literature DB >> 15314036

Do benefits and barriers differ by stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening?

S M Rawl1, U Menon, V L Champion, F E May, P Loehrer, C Hunter, F Azzouz, P O Monahan, C S Skinner.   

Abstract

In 2003, over 148,300 people were expected to be diagnosed and 56,000 to die from colorectal cancer (CRC). First-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with colon cancer have a two- to eight-fold increased risk for CRC. Despite evidence that screening is effective, adherence with screening recommendations in this at-risk population is low. This study's purposes were to (1) identify perceived benefits and barriers of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, and (2) compare demographic characteristics and perceived benefits and barriers by stage of adoption for CRC screening. Participating FDRs (n = 257) completed a 40-min structured telephone interview. Despite high rates of agreement with the benefits of screening, most FDRs were not contemplating being screened. Of those 50 and older, most were in precontemplation for FOBT, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. Older age was related to stage for FOBT and sigmoidoscopy, but not colonoscopy. Lack of provider recommendation also was related to stage. Consistent with theoretical predictions, precontemplators had (1) higher rates of endorsement of specific barriers to screening and (2) lower rates of endorsement of benefits than contemplators or actors. For morbidity and mortality reduction, participation in routine, periodic screening is imperative. These findings can guide development of screening-promoting interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15314036     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyg110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  32 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Identifying cluster subtypes for intentions to have colorectal cancer screening among non-compliant intermediate-risk siblings of individuals with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Elliot J Coups; Gary Winkel; Arnold Markowitz; Neal J Meropol; Samuel M Lesko; Paul B Jacobsen; Daniel Haller; Lina Jandorf; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-08-04

3.  Knowledge of colorectal cancer screening guidelines and intention to obtain screening among nonadherent Filipino, Hmong, and Korean Americans.

Authors:  Janice Y Tsoh; Elisa K Tong; Angela U Sy; Susan L Stewart; Ginny L Gildengorin; Tung T Nguyen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Do individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer adhere to medical recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Karen Bronner; Ilse Mesters; Ahuva Weiss-Meilnik; Ravit Geva; Guy Rozner; Hana Strul; Moshe Inbar; Zamir Halpern; Revital Kariv
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-15

6.  The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elif Temucin; Nursen O Nahcivan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Public health and cooperative group partnership: a colorectal cancer intervention.

Authors:  Sherri G Homan; Bob R Steward; Jane M Armer
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.315

8.  A Process Evaluation of the Alaska Native Colorectal Cancer Family Outreach Program.

Authors:  Diana Redwood; Ellen Provost; Ellen D S Lopez; Monica Skewes; Rhonda Johnson; Claudia Christensen; Frank Sacco; Donald Haverkamp
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2015-07-08

9.  Patient trust in physician influences colorectal cancer screening in low-income patients.

Authors:  Shivani Gupta; Alison T Brenner; Neda Ratanawongsa; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Development of a Practical Model for Targeting Patient Decision Support Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  Alison Tytell Brenner; Shivani Gupta; Linda K Ko; Nancy Janz; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.