Literature DB >> 15313255

Replication of Mu prophages lacking the central strong gyrase site.

Martin L Pato1.   

Abstract

Replication of Mu prophages lacking the central strong gyrase site (SGS) is severely slowed. To study details of the replication of these prophages, an assay was developed for determining the rate and extent of introduction of nicks at the 3'-ends of a Mu prophage, an early step in Mu replicative transposition. The maximal level of end-nicking of a prophage with the SGS, about 70-90% depending upon the host strain, was achieved within about 15 min after induction, whereas at that time less than 5% nicking was observed with a prophage lacking the SGS. The amount of nicking at the end of the SGS(-) prophage increased with time, and approx. 30% nicking of the SGS(-) prophage was achieved by 60 min post-induction. Nicking kinetics were identical at each end of the prophages, and no nicking was observed at the 5'-ends of the prophages, verifying in vivo the earlier results with in vitro systems. To determine if prophage location affects the kinetics of replication, we examined prophages at numerous chromosomal locations. SGS(+) prophages at different chromosomal locations showed essentially identical replication kinetics. SGS(-) prophages showed a range of delays in replication and host lysis. A gradient of delays was apparent, with prophages further from the chromosomal origin of replication, oriC, showing longer delays than ones nearer to oriC. However, there were also exceptions to this overall gradient. Possible explanations for the differences in the delays observed with SGS(-) prophages are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15313255     DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Microbiol        ISSN: 0923-2508            Impact factor:   3.992


  7 in total

Review 1.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

2.  Bacteriophage Mu targets the trinucleotide sequence CGG.

Authors:  Dipankar Manna; Shuang Deng; Adam M Breier; N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Repair of transposable phage Mu DNA insertions begins only when the E. coli replisome collides with the transpososome.

Authors:  Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Deep sequencing reveals new roles for MuB in transposition immunity and target-capture, and redefines the insular Ter region of E. coli.

Authors:  David M Walker; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2020-07-09

5.  The Mu story: how a maverick phage moved the field forward.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2012-12-05

6.  Transposable prophage Mu is organized as a stable chromosomal domain of E. coli.

Authors:  Rudra P Saha; Zheng Lou; Luke Meng; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Mu-driven transposition of recombinant mini-Mu unit DNA in the Corynebacterium glutamicum chromosome.

Authors:  Natalya V Gorshkova; Juliya S Lobanova; Irina L Tokmakova; Sergey V Smirnov; Valerii Z Akhverdyan; Alexander A Krylov; Sergey V Mashko
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.813

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.