OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional diagnostic and clinical value of the second test generation of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (CCP2) compared with rheumatoid factor isotypes (IgG-RF, IgA-RF, IgM-RF) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: This was a prospective study on 715 patients: rheumatoid arthritis (n = 295), degenerative or other inflammatory joint disease (n = 163), connective tissue disease or vasculitis (n = 103), and healthy controls (n = 154). Sera from each subject were tested for CCP2 and RF isotypes by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Agreement with clinical indices such as disease activity, joint destruction, disease duration, and other laboratory tests was assessed. Sensitivity and specificity of the tests were evaluated taking the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. RESULTS: Highest sensitivity was found for IgM-RF (66.4%) and CCP (64.4%). Highest specificity was achieved by CCP (97.1%) and IgG-RF (91.0%). In rheumatoid patients with high disease activity or severe joint damage, CCP was more often present (81.4% and 83.6%) than all RF isotypes. Of special diagnostic value was the detection of positive CCP in 34.5% of all patients with rheumatoid arthritis when all measured RF isotypes (IgG-RF, IgA-RF, and IgM-RF) were negative. CONCLUSIONS: As a screening method for rheumatoid arthritis the IgM-RF and the CCP assays are superior to other RF isotypes. Positivity in the highly specific CCP ELISA supports the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. CCP proved to be a powerful diagnostic tool, especially in ambiguous cases or RF negative patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional diagnostic and clinical value of the second test generation of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (CCP2) compared with rheumatoid factor isotypes (IgG-RF, IgA-RF, IgM-RF) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: This was a prospective study on 715 patients: rheumatoid arthritis (n = 295), degenerative or other inflammatory joint disease (n = 163), connective tissue disease or vasculitis (n = 103), and healthy controls (n = 154). Sera from each subject were tested for CCP2 and RF isotypes by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Agreement with clinical indices such as disease activity, joint destruction, disease duration, and other laboratory tests was assessed. Sensitivity and specificity of the tests were evaluated taking the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. RESULTS: Highest sensitivity was found for IgM-RF (66.4%) and CCP (64.4%). Highest specificity was achieved by CCP (97.1%) and IgG-RF (91.0%). In rheumatoidpatients with high disease activity or severe joint damage, CCP was more often present (81.4% and 83.6%) than all RF isotypes. Of special diagnostic value was the detection of positive CCP in 34.5% of all patients with rheumatoid arthritis when all measured RF isotypes (IgG-RF, IgA-RF, and IgM-RF) were negative. CONCLUSIONS: As a screening method for rheumatoid arthritis the IgM-RF and the CCP assays are superior to other RF isotypes. Positivity in the highly specific CCP ELISA supports the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. CCP proved to be a powerful diagnostic tool, especially in ambiguous cases or RF negative patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Authors: M Boers; A C Verhoeven; H M Markusse; M A van de Laar; R Westhovens; J C van Denderen; D van Zeben; B A Dijkmans; A J Peeters; P Jacobs; H R van den Brink; H J Schouten; D M van der Heijde; A Boonen; S van der Linden Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-08-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: E Girbal-Neuhauser; J J Durieux; M Arnaud; P Dalbon; M Sebbag; C Vincent; M Simon; T Senshu; C Masson-Bessière; C Jolivet-Reynaud; M Jolivet; G Serre Journal: J Immunol Date: 1999-01-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: K B Eberhardt; L Truedsson; H Pettersson; B Svensson; L Stigsson; J L Eberhardt; F A Wollheim Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: G A Schellekens; B A de Jong; F H van den Hoogen; L B van de Putte; W J van Venrooij Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-01-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: A van der Heide; J W Jacobs; J W Bijlsma; A H Heurkens; C van Booma-Frankfort; M J van der Veen; H C Haanen; D M Hofman; G A van Albada-Kuipers; E J ter Borg; H L Brus; H J Dinant; A A Kruize; Y Schenk Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1996-04-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jason R Kolfenbach; Kevin D Deane; Lezlie A Derber; Colin O'Donnell; Michael H Weisman; Jane H Buckner; Vivian H Gersuk; Shan Wei; Ted R Mikuls; James O'Dell; Peter K Gregersen; Richard M Keating; Jill M Norris; V Michael Holers Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2009-12-15
Authors: Jing Cui; Kimberly E Taylor; Anita L Destefano; Lindsey A Criswell; Elena S Izmailova; Alex Parker; Ronenn Roubenoff; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; Elizabeth W Karlson Journal: Mol Med Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 6.354