Literature DB >> 8633829

The effectiveness of early treatment with "second-line" antirheumatic drugs. A randomized, controlled trial.

A van der Heide1, J W Jacobs, J W Bijlsma, A H Heurkens, C van Booma-Frankfort, M J van der Veen, H C Haanen, D M Hofman, G A van Albada-Kuipers, E J ter Borg, H L Brus, H J Dinant, A A Kruize, Y Schenk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two therapeutic strategies for patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.
DESIGN: Open, randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Outpatient clinics of six clinical centers. PATIENTS: 238 consecutive patients with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis.
INTERVENTIONS: Delayed or immediate introduction of treatment with slow-acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs). MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points were functional disability, pain, joint score, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate at 6 and 12 months and progression of radiologic abnormalities at 12 months.
RESULTS: Statistically significant advantages at 12 months for patients receiving the SAARD strategy (immediate treatment with SAARDs) with regard to all primary end points that may be clinically important are indicated by the differences in improvements from baseline and their 95% CIs. These differences were 0.3 (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.6) for disability (range, 0 to 3), 10 mm (CI, 1 to 19 mm) for pain (range, 0 to 100 mm), 39 (CI, 4 to 74) for joint score (range, 0 to 534), and 11 mm/h (CI, 3 to 19 mm/h) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (range, 1 to 140 mm/h), all in favor of SAARD treatment. The SAARD strategy also appears to be advantageous at 6 months. Radiologic abnormalities progressed at an equal rate in the SAARD and the non-SAARD groups; the difference in progression (range, 0 to 448) was 1 (CI, -3 to 5). Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle and thus included 29% of patients in the non-SAARD group who discontinued the non-SAARD treatment strategy; treatment was usually discontinued because of insufficient effectiveness. The SAARD strategy including two alternative SAARDs could not be continued by 8% of patients, usually because of adverse reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Early introduction of SAARDs may be more beneficial than delayed introduction for patients with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8633829     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-8-199604150-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  110 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a review of recent clinical trials.

Authors:  T Mikuls; L Moreland
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Recent advances: rheumatology.

Authors:  R Madhok; H Kerr; H A Capell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-07

3.  Markers of joint destruction: principles, problems, and potential.

Authors:  S A Young-Min; T E Cawston; I D Griffiths
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Aggressive treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial. On behalf of the Rheumatic Research Foundation Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Authors:  C H van Jaarsveld; J W Jacobs; M J van der Veen; A A Blaauw; A A Kruize; D M Hofman; H L Brus; G A van Albada-Kuipers; A H Heurkens; E J ter Borg; H C Haanen; C van Booma-Frankfort; Y Schenk; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Articular damage in late rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Emel Eksioglu; Reyhan Tuncay; Eda Gurcay; Ajda Bal; Aytul Cakci
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  [Drug therapy of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  U Arndt; M Rittmeister; B Möller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The challenge of following process, damage, and function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical care.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  Rheumatoid arthritis in 2003: where are we now with treatment?

Authors:  M E Weinblatt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Radiological outcome after four years of early versus delayed treatment strategy in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J van Aken; L R Lard; S le Cessie; J M W Hazes; F C Breedveld; T W J Huizinga
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical care.

Authors:  J S Smolen; D Aletaha
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.