Literature DB >> 15307548

Role of the Abiomed BVS 5000 device for short-term support and bridge to transplantation.

Jeffrey A Morgan1, Allan S Stewart, Brian J Lee, Mehmet C Oz, Yoshifumi Naka.   

Abstract

Over the last 10 years, we have gained experience implanting the Abiomed BVS 5000 (Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, MA) device for short-term mechanical support. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with this device. From April 1993 through January 2003, 71 patients underwent implantation of an Abiomed BVS 5000 device. This included 19 left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), 30 right ventricular assist devices (RVADs), and 22 biventricular assist devices (BIVADs). Demographics of device recipients, conditions for mechanical support, and outcome were evaluated for each device type. Devices were inserted for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 53 (74.6%) patients and precardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 18 (25.4%) patients. Mean duration of support was 4.9+/-4.1 days, with 64 (90.1 %) patients supported for fewer than 10 days. Twenty-nine (40.8%) patients were successfully weaned from support after myocardial recovery: 7 (36.8%) LVADs, 13 (43.3%) RVADs, and 9 (40.9%) BIVADs. Eight (11.3%) patients received devices as a "bridge to bridge," undergoing implantation of a long-term HeartMate LVAD (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA): six (31.6%) LVADs and two (9.1 %) BIVADs. Seven (9.9%) Abiomed patients were successfully bridged to transplantation: two (10.5%) LVADs, two (6.7%) RVADs, and three (13.6%) BIVADs. Overall, 44 (62.0%) patients survived support: weaned, "bridged to bridge," or transplanted. The Abiomed BVS 5000 can be used effectively for short-term stabilization and for bridging to transplant in select patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15307548     DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000130680.63196.7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  8 in total

1.  Mechanical circulatory support with the ABIOMED BVS 5000: the Toronto General Hospital experience.

Authors:  Vidyadhar Lad; Abdelsalam Elhenawy; Steve Harwood; Jane Maciver; Mitesh Vallabh Badiwala; Mark Vallelonga; Terrence M Yau; Robert J Cusimano; Diego H Delgado; Heather J Ross; Vivek Rao
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  In vivo testing of a novel blood pump for short-term extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Nicholas R Teman; David S Demos; Benjamin S Bryner; Bradley Faliks; Emilia M Jahangir; Daniel E Mazur; Alvaro Rojas-Pena; Robert H Bartlett; Jonathan W Haft
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Current status of extracorporeal ventricular assist devices in Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Nishimura
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 4.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Myocardial recovery with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Maya Guglin; Leslie Miller
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-08

6.  Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Chetan B Patel; Kevin M Alexander; Joseph G Rogers
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-12

7.  Improving outcomes in patients with ventricular assist devices transferred from outlying to tertiary care hospitals.

Authors:  Mark B Anderson; Eric Gratz; Raymond K Wong; Karim Benali; Robert T V Kung
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2007-03

8.  The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge).

Authors:  Igor D Gregoric; Leon P Jacob; Saverio La Francesca; Brian A Bruckner; William E Cohn; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar; O H Frazier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.