Literature DB >> 17486873

Improving outcomes in patients with ventricular assist devices transferred from outlying to tertiary care hospitals.

Mark B Anderson1, Eric Gratz, Raymond K Wong, Karim Benali, Robert T V Kung.   

Abstract

In this retrospective study, the implant course and outcome of patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs) transferred from outlying "spoke" hospitals and converted nonsurgically to a device designed for ambulation at tertiary care "hub" hospitals are evaluated. Factors affecting the crucial decision to transfer and to convert devices have not previously been characterized. Data from 50 patients at 26 US hub institutions were voluntarily submitted to a VAD data registry at ABIOMED, between December 2003 and December 2005. The patients were transferred from 40 spokes on the BVS 5000 Blood Pump and converted to the AB5000 Ventricle (both ABIOMED) at hubs. Comparisons were made on implant indications, time-course, and end-organ function at the time of conversion between surviving patients and patients that had died. Patients who were transferred and converted had a survival to recovery or to next therapy rate of 42%. Eighteen of the surviving patients were still alive 30 days after the explant: 61% were weaned, 33% were transplanted, and 5.6% received a destination device. Average implant-to-transfer time was 1.5 vs. 2.0 days for 30-day survivors and expired patients, respectively, whereas support time from transfer to conversion was 4.8 vs. 4 days, respectively. At the time of device conversion, a total bilirubin below a threshold level of 3.5 mg/dL was predictive of 30-day survival (n = 26, p = .03, odds ratio = 2.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-6.16). Patients who survived 30 days were supported longer than those who died (35 vs. 21.1 days, p = .026). At least 18 patients recovered sufficiently on the AB5000 Ventricle to tolerate extubation and 11 patients were able to ambulate. Liver function after implant both at the spoke and before conversion at the hub may be a good indicator of patient survivability. Patients transferred from the BVS 5000 Blood Pump benefited from easy, safe conversion to the AB5000 Ventricle, which provided them with additional support time and afforded the opportunity to recover native heart function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17486873      PMCID: PMC4680681     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  14 in total

1.  Left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplant network improves survival after failed cardiotomy.

Authors:  D N Helman; D L Morales; N M Edwards; D M Mancini; J M Chen; E A Rose; M C Oz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Application of "double bridge mechanical" resuscitation for profound cardiogenic shock leading to cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  F W Bowen; A F Carboni; M L O'Hara; A Pochettino; B R Rosengard; R J Morris; R C Gorman; J H Gorman; M A Acker
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Implantation of a left ventricular assist device and the hub-and-spoke system in treating acute cardiogenic shock: who survives?

Authors:  Aftab R Kherani; Faisal H Cheema; Mehmet C Oz; Jennifer M Fal; Jeffrey A Morgan; Veli K Topkara; David A Wilson; Deon W Vigilance; Mauricio J Garrido; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Mechanical support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  D J Goldstein; M C Oz
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-07

5.  Emergent mechanical support in the community: improvement with early transplant center referral.

Authors:  Rohinton J Morris; Alberto Pochettino; Marylou O'Hara; Timothy J Gardner; Michael A Acker
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Management of acute cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Louis E Samuels; Eduardo S Darzé
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.213

8.  Revised screening scale to predict survival after insertion of a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Vivek Rao; Mehmet C Oz; Margaret A Flannery; Katharine A Catanese; Michael Argenziano; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Importance of preoperative liver function as a predictor of survival in patients supported with Thoratec ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation.

Authors:  O Reinhartz; D J Farrar; J H Hershon; G J Avery; E A Haeusslein; J D Hill
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Transplant candidate's clinical status rather than right ventricular function defines need for univentricular versus biventricular support.

Authors:  R L Kormos; T A Gasior; A Kawai; S M Pham; S Murali; B G Hattler; B P Griffith
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  1 in total

1.  The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge).

Authors:  Igor D Gregoric; Leon P Jacob; Saverio La Francesca; Brian A Bruckner; William E Cohn; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar; O H Frazier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.