OBJECTIVES: We examined differences in sexual partner selection between Black and White men who have sex with men (MSM) to better understand how HIV status of participants' sexual partners and related psychosocial measures influence risk taking among these men. METHODS: We collected cross-sectional surveys from self-reported HIV-negative Black MSM and White MSM attending a gay pride festival in Atlanta, Georgia. RESULTS: HIV-negative White MSM were more likely than were HIV-negative Black MSM to report having unprotected anal intercourse with HIV-negative men, and HIV-negative Black MSM were more likely than were HIV-negative White MSM to report having unprotected anal intercourse with HIV status unknown partners. Furthermore, White MSM were more likely to endorse serosorting (limiting unprotected partners to those who have the same HIV status) beliefs and favorable HIV disclosure beliefs than were Black MSM. CONCLUSIONS: White MSM appear to use sexual partner-related risk reduction strategies to reduce the likelihood of HIV infection more than do Black MSM. Partner selection strategies have serious limitations; however, they may explain in part the disproportionate number of HIV infections among Black MSM.
OBJECTIVES: We examined differences in sexual partner selection between Black and White men who have sex with men (MSM) to better understand how HIV status of participants' sexual partners and related psychosocial measures influence risk taking among these men. METHODS: We collected cross-sectional surveys from self-reported HIV-negative Black MSM and White MSM attending a gay pride festival in Atlanta, Georgia. RESULTS: HIV-negative White MSM were more likely than were HIV-negative Black MSM to report having unprotected anal intercourse with HIV-negative men, and HIV-negative Black MSM were more likely than were HIV-negative White MSM to report having unprotected anal intercourse with HIV status unknown partners. Furthermore, White MSM were more likely to endorse serosorting (limiting unprotected partners to those who have the same HIV status) beliefs and favorable HIV disclosure beliefs than were Black MSM. CONCLUSIONS: White MSM appear to use sexual partner-related risk reduction strategies to reduce the likelihood of HIV infection more than do Black MSM. Partner selection strategies have serious limitations; however, they may explain in part the disproportionate number of HIV infections among Black MSM.
Authors: T P Suarez; J A Kelly; S D Pinkerton; Y L Stevenson; M Hayat; M D Smith; T Ertl Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Lisa A Eaton; Seth C Kalichman; Demetria N Cain; Chauncey Cherry; Heidi L Stearns; Christina M Amaral; Jody A Flanagan; Howard L Pope Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Brooke E E Montgomery; Katharine E Stewart; Patricia B Wright; Jean McSweeney; Brenda M Booth Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Hong-Van Tieu; Vijay Nandi; Donald R Hoover; Debbie Lucy; Kiwan Stewart; Victoria Frye; Magdalena Cerda; Danielle Ompad; Carl Latkin; Beryl A Koblin Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.078