Literature DB >> 15303410

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis and public perceptions of biomedical research: a focus group study.

Benjamin R Bates1, Tina M Harris.   

Abstract

African Americans are less likely than European Americans to participate in biomedical research. Researchers often attribute nonparticipation to the "Tuskegee effect." Using critical qualitative analysis of focus group data, we examined the public's use of the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis (TSUS) to discuss biomedical research. Our participants articulated three primary themes in relation to TSUS: 1) that TSUS made them suspicious about biomedical research; 2) that other values had to weigh against concerns about TSUS; and 3) that African Americans could take steps to resolve their concerns about TSUS. African Americans were more likely to discuss TSUS than were European Americans. African Americans did not use TSUS to express simple fear. African Americans suggested issues other than TSUS that influence the decision to participate in research. African Americans indicated specific reforms that would increase participation in research. We discuss how a better understanding of African Americans' use of TSUS can enhance research participation and allay concerns about "another Tuskegee."

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15303410      PMCID: PMC2568492     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  37 in total

Review 1.  Unraveling the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis.

Authors:  R M White
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-13

2.  Investigators' responsibilities for human subjects in developing countries.

Authors:  M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Tuskegee: could it happen again?

Authors:  S M Reverby
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Sociocultural issues in clinical research: unraveling the Tuskegee syphilis study.

Authors:  Robert M White
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-08

5.  THE TUSKEGEE STUDY OF UNTREATED SYPHILIS; THE 30TH YEAR OF OBSERVATION.

Authors:  D H ROCKWELL; A R YOBS; M B MOORE
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1964-12

6.  Dissimilarities between Tuskegee Study and HIV/AIDS programs emphasized.

Authors:  G B Grunfeld
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The challenge of minority recruitment in clinical trials for AIDS.

Authors:  W el-Sadr; L Capps
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Paternalism, informed consent and Tuskegee.

Authors:  J D Cox
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: genes, environments, and personal behaviors.

Authors:  Roxanne L Parrott; Kami J Silk; Celeste Condit
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system.

Authors:  G M Swanson; A J Ward
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  35 in total

1.  The Role of Intrinsic Motivation in the Pursuit of Health Science-Related Careers among Youth from Underrepresented Low Socioeconomic Populations.

Authors:  Bradley O Boekeloo; Chandria Jones; Krishna Bhagat; Junaed Siddiqui; Min Qi Wang
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Characterization of frequent douchers attending a community clinic primarily serving African-American women.

Authors:  Lisa V Smith; Ellen T Rudy; Sylvia D Ivie; Donzella Lee; Barbara Visscher; Peter Kerndt
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care?

Authors:  Dwayne T Brandon; Lydia A Isaac; Thomas A LaVeist
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 4.  Awareness and knowledge of the U.S. Public Health Service syphilis study at Tuskegee: implications for biomedical research.

Authors:  Jan M McCallum; Dhananjaya M Arekere; B Lee Green; Ralph V Katz; Brian M Rivers
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2006-11

5.  The Tuskegee Legacy Project: willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; S Steven Kegeles; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Sherman A James; Stefanie Luise Russell; Cristina Claudio
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2006-11

6.  Awareness of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the US presidential apology and their influence on minority participation in biomedical research.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; S Stephen Kegeles; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Sherman A James; Min Qi Wang; Stefanie L Russell; Cristina Claudio
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  African-American community attitudes and perceptions toward schizophrenia and medical research: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Lynnae A Hamilton; Muktar H Aliyu; Paul D Lyons; Roberta May; Charlie L Swanson; Robert Savage; Rodney C P Go
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Narrative constructions of health care issues and policies: the case of President Clinton's apology-by-proxy for the Tuskegee syphilis experiment.

Authors:  Heather J Carmack; Benjamin R Bates; Lynn M Harter
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2008-06

9.  Barriers and Strategies Related to Qualitative Research on Genetic Ancestry Testing in Indigenous Communities.

Authors:  Jessica W Blanchard; Gloria Tallbull; Chantelle Wolpert; Jill Powell; Morris W Foster; Charmaine Royal
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Participation in biomedical research studies and cancer screenings: perceptions of risks to minorities compared with whites.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; Min Qi Wang; B Lee Green; Nancy R Kressin; Cristina Claudio; Stefanie Luise Russell; Christelle Sommervil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.