OBJECTIVES: We compared the influence of awareness of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the presidential apology for that study on the willingness of Blacks, non-Hispanic Whites, and Hispanics to participate in biomedical research. METHODS: The Tuskegee Legacy Project Questionnaire was administered to 1133 adults in 4 US cities. This 60-item questionnaire addressed issues related to the recruitment of minorities into biomedical studies. RESULTS: Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that, compared with Whites, Blacks were nearly 4 times as likely to have heard of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, more than twice as likely to have correctly named Clinton as the president who made the apology, and 2 to 3 times more likely to have been willing to participate in biomedical studies despite having heard about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (odds ratio [OR]=2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4, 6.2) or the presidential apology (OR=2.3; 95% CI=1.4, 3.9). CONCLUSIONS: These marked differences likely reflect the cultural reality in the Black community, which has been accustomed to increased risks in many activities. For Whites, this type of information may have been more shocking and at odds with their expectations and, thus, led to a stronger negative impact.
OBJECTIVES: We compared the influence of awareness of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the presidential apology for that study on the willingness of Blacks, non-Hispanic Whites, and Hispanics to participate in biomedical research. METHODS: The Tuskegee Legacy Project Questionnaire was administered to 1133 adults in 4 US cities. This 60-item questionnaire addressed issues related to the recruitment of minorities into biomedical studies. RESULTS: Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that, compared with Whites, Blacks were nearly 4 times as likely to have heard of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, more than twice as likely to have correctly named Clinton as the president who made the apology, and 2 to 3 times more likely to have been willing to participate in biomedical studies despite having heard about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (odds ratio [OR]=2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4, 6.2) or the presidential apology (OR=2.3; 95% CI=1.4, 3.9). CONCLUSIONS: These marked differences likely reflect the cultural reality in the Black community, which has been accustomed to increased risks in many activities. For Whites, this type of information may have been more shocking and at odds with their expectations and, thus, led to a stronger negative impact.
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Lisa A Cooper; Lloyd E Ratner; Thomas A LaVeist; Neil R Powe Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: S Sengupta; R P Strauss; R DeVellis; S C Quinn; B DeVellis; W B Ware Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2000-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Henrie M Treadwell; Ronald L Braithwaite; Kisha Braithwaite; Desiree Oliver; Rhonda Holliday Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Linda Boise; Ladson Hinton; Howard J Rosen; Mary C Ruhl; Hiroko Dodge; Nora Mattek; Marilyn Albert; Andrea Denny; Joshua D Grill; Travonia Hughes; Jennifer H Lingler; Darby Morhardt; Francine Parfitt; Susan Peterson-Hazan; Viorela Pop; Tara Rose; Raj C Shah Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2017 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Hannah M Kerman; Savannah R Smith; Karen C Smith; Jamie E Collins; Lisa G Suter; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Ralph V Katz; Min Qi Wang; B Lee Green; Nancy R Kressin; Cristina Claudio; Stefanie Luise Russell; Christelle Sommervil Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Ralph V Katz; Germain Jean-Charles; B Lee Green; Nancy R Kressin; Cristina Claudio; Minqi Wang; Stefanie L Russell; Jason Outlaw Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 3.295