Literature DB >> 15302909

Thin primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: a prognostic tree for 10-year metastasis is more accurate than American Joint Committee on Cancer staging.

Phyllis A Gimotty1, DuPont Guerry, Michael E Ming, Rosalie Elenitsas, Xiaowei Xu, Brian Czerniecki, Francis Spitz, Lynn Schuchter, David Elder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The majority of invasive primary melanomas are thin (< or = 1.00 mm). Since the current staging system imperfectly predicts outcome in patients with such lesions, we sought to develop a more effective classification scheme to better identify both patients at high risk of metastasis who are candidates for further staging and therapy and those with little risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 884 patients who had thin invasive melanomas. A tree-structured analysis of 10-year metastasis was used to develop a new classification scheme.
RESULTS: The overall 10-year metastasis rate was 6.5% (95% CI, 4.8% to 8.1%). The prognostic tree defined four risk groups: high-risk: men with vertical growth phase (VGP) lesions that had mitotic rates (MRs) greater than 0, and for whom the 10-year metastasis rate was 31% (22% to 42%; n = 90); moderate-risk: women with VGP lesions that had MRs greater than 0 and for whom the rate was 13% (9% to 18%; n = 136); low-risk: patients with VGP lesions that had MR of 0 for whom the rate was 4% (2% to 7%; n = 247); and minimal-risk: patients with invasive lesions without VGP for whom the rate was 0.5% (0% to 1.2%; n = 411). Survival curves differed significantly among the four groups (P <.001).
CONCLUSION: Growth phase, mitotic rate, and sex are important prognostic factors for patients with thin melanomas, and they identify subgroups at substantial risk for metastasis. After validation in other populations, the proposed prognostic tree will be useful in the design of clinical trials and clinical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15302909     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  49 in total

Review 1.  A review of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

Authors:  K M Joyce; N M McInerney; C W Joyce; D M Jones; A J Hussey; P Donnellan; M J Kerin; J L Kelly; P J Regan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 121 low-risk melanomas (tumour thickness <1.00 mm) on the basis of a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Torsten Hinz; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Anja Wierzbicki; Tobias Höller; Jörg Wenzel; Hans-Jürgen Biersack; Thomas Bieber; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Prognostic significance of mitotic rate in localized primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of patients in the multi-institutional American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging database.

Authors:  John F Thompson; Seng-Jaw Soong; Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Shouluan Ding; Daniel G Coit; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; Timothy Johnson; Marcella M Johnson; Stanley P Leong; Merrick I Ross; David R Byrd; Natale Cascinelli; Alistair J Cochran; Alexander M Eggermont; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Analysis of tumor mitotic rate in thin metastatic melanomas compared with thin melanomas without metastasis using both the hematoxylin and eosin and anti-phosphohistone 3 IHC stain.

Authors:  Sumeet Thareja; Jonathan S Zager; Divya Sadhwani; Shalini Thareja; Ren Chen; Suroosh Marzban; Drazen M Jukic; Lewis F Glass; Jane Messina
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Clark level risk stratifies patients with mitogenic thin melanomas for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Phyllis A Gimotty; Andrew J Sinnamon; Heather Wachtel; Robert E Roses; Lynn Schuchter; Xiaowei Xu; David E Elder; Michael Ming; Rosalie Elenitsas; DuPont Guerry; Rachel R Kelz; Brian J Czerniecki; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it?

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Thomas Eigentler; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

7.  A high proliferative index of recurrent melanoma is associated with worse survival.

Authors:  Ting J Tu; Michelle W Ma; Stefano Monni; Amy E Rose; Herman Yee; Farbod Darvishian; David Polsky; Russell S Berman; Richard L Shapiro; Anna C Pavlick; Madhu Mazumdar; Iman Osman
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.935

8.  Thin melanoma and late recurrences: it is never too thin and never too late.

Authors:  Antonio Giovanni Richetta; Ugo Bottoni; Giovanni Paolino; Rita Clerico; Carmen Cantisani; Marina Ambrifi; Paola Corsetti; Stefano Calvieri
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Histopathology report of cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node in Europe: a web-based survey by the Dermatopathology Working Group of the European Society of Pathology.

Authors:  Anna Batistatou; Martin G Cook; Daniela Massi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Identification of Patients with Intermediate Thickness Melanoma at Low Risk for Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Madalyn G Peters; Anne Blair; Mark S Etherington; David E Elder; Xiaowei G Xu; DuPont Guerry; Michael E Ming; Douglas L Fraker; Brian J Czerniecki; Phyllis A Gimotty; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.