Literature DB >> 22160198

Prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 121 low-risk melanomas (tumour thickness <1.00 mm) on the basis of a long-term follow-up.

Torsten Hinz1, Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar, Anja Wierzbicki, Tobias Höller, Jörg Wenzel, Hans-Jürgen Biersack, Thomas Bieber, Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted procedure to accurately stage melanomas with a thickness ≥1 mm. The value of SLNB in thin melanomas is still controversial, especially because long-term observations of these patients are rare. The purpose of the current study was to identify the positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) ratio in low-risk patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM) of thickness less than 1 mm and its possible prognostic value, focusing on long-term follow-up data.
METHODS: In a retrospective single-centre study performed at the Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University of Bonn, 121 patients who had received SLNB were identified out of 621 patients with a diagnosis of CM of <1.00 mm thickness presenting between September 2000 and February 2009 (mean follow-up time, 50.9 months).
RESULTS: Of the 121 patients, 5 (4.1%) had a positive SLN. All positive SLNs were found in patients with a tumour thickness between 0.90 mm and 1.00 mm. There were no significant differences in the presence of positive SLNs according to Clark level and ulceration status (Clark levels II and III and no ulceration vs. Clark levels IV and V or ulceration), regression, gender or age. Disease-free survival was 100% in the SLN-positive patients. On the other hand, five SLN-negative patients (4.1%) developed disease progression. One of these five progressive patients showed recurrence in the former negative SLN basin (16.7% false-negative rate).
CONCLUSION: A positive SLN in thin melanomas is uncommon with a prevalence of 4.1% in our study population. We could not identify reliable clinicopathological risk factors which could predict results of SLNB in thin melanomas. Based on our results, SLNB may be considered in patients with a melanoma of thickness in the range 0.90-0.99 mm, because all SLN-positive patients belonged to this subgroup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22160198     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-2009-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  37 in total

1.  Reliability of the sentinel node procedure in melanoma patients: analysis of failures after long-term follow-up.

Authors:  M G Statius Muller; P J Borgstein; R Pijpers; P A van Leeuwen; P J van Diest; A Gupta; S Meijer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Characterization of micrometastatic disease in melanoma sentinel lymph nodes by enhanced pathology: recommendations for standardizing pathologic analysis.

Authors:  Kathryn Spanknebel; Daniel G Coit; Samuel C Bieligk; Mithat Gonen; Juan Rosai; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanoma.

Authors:  Matthew W Miller; John T Vetto; Marcus M Monroe; Roshanthi Weerasinghe; Peter E Andersen; Neil D Gross
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Outcome of patients with melanoma and histologically negative sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  M A Gadd; A B Cosimi; J Yu; L M Duncan; L Yu; T J Flotte; W W Souba; M J Ott; L S Wong; A J Sober; M C Mihm; F G Haluska; K K Tanabe
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-04

5.  Vertical growth phase and positive sentinel node in thin melanoma.

Authors:  R S Oliveira Filho; L M Ferreira; L J Biasi; M M S S Enokihara; G R Paiva; J Wagner
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 2.590

6.  Indications for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy in patients with thin melanoma (Breslow thickness < or =1.0 mm).

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Pamela A Groben; Stacey L Stern; Nancy E Thomas; Thomas A Hensing; Leah B Sansbury; David W Ollila
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Patterns of recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in 243 patients with stage I or II melanoma.

Authors:  J E Gershenwald; M I Colome; J E Lee; P F Mansfield; C Tseng; J J Lee; C M Balch; M I Ross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The risk of regional lymph node metastases in patients with melanoma less than 1.0 mm thick: recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  John L Zapas; H Christopher Coley; Sandra L Beam; Sally D Brown; Kathleen A Jablonski; E George Elias
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanomas.

Authors:  Doreen M Agnese; Shahab F Abdessalam; William E Burak; Cynthia M Magro; Rodney V Pozderac; Michael J Walker
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Revised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criteria accurately predict sentinel lymph node positivity in clinically node-negative melanoma patients.

Authors:  Dennis L Rousseau; Merrick I Ross; Marcella M Johnson; Victor G Prieto; Jeffrey E Lee; Paul F Mansfield; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

Authors:  K M Joyce; N M McInerney; C W Joyce; D M Jones; A J Hussey; P Donnellan; M J Kerin; J L Kelly; P J Regan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Analysis of melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Maggie Hodges; Edward Jones; Teresa Jones; Nathan Pearlman; Csaba Gajdos; Nicole Kounalakis; Martin McCarter
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-08-10

3.  Sentinel lymph node status as most important prognostic factor in patients with high-risk cutaneous melanomas (tumour thickness >4.00 mm): outcome analysis from a single institution.

Authors:  Torsten Hinz; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Anja Wierzbicki; Tobias Hoeller; Joerg Wenzel; Hans-J Biersack; Thomas Bieber; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Predictive Values of Pathological and Clinical Risk Factors for Positivity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hanzi Huang; Ziyao Fu; Jiang Ji; Jiuzuo Huang; Xiao Long
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Is it Necessary to Perform Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma? A Retrospective Single Center Analysis.

Authors:  A Kocsis; L Karsko; Zs Kurgyis; Zs Besenyi; L Pavics; E Dosa-Racz; E Kis; E Baltas; H Ocsai; E Varga; B Bende; A Varga; G Mohos; I Korom; J Varga; L Kemeny; I B Nemeth; J Olah
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.201

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.