Literature DB >> 15301619

Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm.

Michael J Wenger1, Bradley S Gibson.   

Abstract

Processing capacity--defined as the relative ability to perform mental work in a unit of time--is a critical construct in cognitive psychology and is central to theories of visual attention. The unambiguous use of the construct, experimentally and theoretically, has been hindered by both conceptual confusions and the use of measures that are at best only coarsely mapped to the construct. However, more than 25 years ago, J. T. Townsend and F. G. Ashby (1978) suggested that the hazard function on the response time (RT) distribution offered a number of conceptual advantages as a measure of capacity. The present study suggests that a set of statistical techniques, well-known outside the cognitive and perceptual literatures, offers the ability to perform hypothesis tests on RT-distribution hazard functions. These techniques are introduced, and their use is illustrated in application to data from the contingent attentional capture paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15301619     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

2.  Modeling and Estimating Recall Processing Capacity: Sensitivity and Diagnostic Utility in Application to Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Michael K Wenger; Selamawit Negash; Ronald C Petersen; Lyndsay Petersen
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 3.  Workload capacity spaces: a unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Ami Eidels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

4.  Working memory's workload capacity.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; James R Coleman; Ami Eidels; Jason M Watson; Joseph Houpt; David L Strayer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-10

5.  The influence of anxiety on processing capacity for threat detection.

Authors:  Helen J Richards; Julie A Hadwin; Valerie Benson; Michael J Wenger; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

6.  A Mixture Proportional Hazards Model With Random Effects for Response Times in Tests.

Authors:  Jochen Ranger; Jörg-Tobias Kuhn
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 7.  Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?

Authors:  Hanna Benoni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

8.  Applying capacity analyses to psychophysical evaluation of multisensory interactions.

Authors:  Christina E Hugenschmidt; Satoru Hayasaka; Ann M Peiffer; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Inf Fusion       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 12.975

9.  Preservation of crossmodal selective attention in healthy aging.

Authors:  Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Thomas P McCoy; Satoru Hayasaka; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Learning to associate auditory and visual stimuli: behavioral and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.