Literature DB >> 15298899

Determinants of gating polarity of a connexin 32 hemichannel.

Seunghoon Oh1, Shira Rivkin, Qingxiu Tang, Vytas K Verselis, Thaddeus A Bargiello.   

Abstract

There is good evidence supporting the view that the transjunctional voltage sensor (V(j)-sensor) of Cx32 and other Group 1 connexins is contained within a segment of the N-terminus that contributes to the formation of the channel pore. We have shown that the addition of negatively charged amino acid residues at several positions within the first 10 amino acid residues reverses the polarity of V(j)-gating and proposed that channel closure is initiated by the inward movement of this region. Here, we report that positive charge substitutions of the 2nd, 5th, and 8th residues maintain the negative polarity of V(j)-gating. These data are consistent with the original gating model. Surprisingly, some channels containing combinations of positive and/or negative charges at the 2nd and 5th positions display bipolar V(j)-gating. The appearance of bipolar gating does not correlate with relative orientation of charges at this position. However, the voltage sensitivity of bipolar channels correlates with the sign of the charge at the 2nd residue, suggesting that charges at this position may have a larger role in determining gating polarity. Taken together with previous findings, the results suggest that the polarity V(j)-gating is not determined by the sign of the charge lying closest to the cytoplasmic entry of the channel, nor is it likely to result from the reorientation of an electrical dipole contained in the N-terminus. We further explore the mechanism of polarity determination by utilizing the one-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Plank model to determine the voltage profile of simple model channels containing regions of permanent charge within the channel pore. These considerations demonstrate how local variations in the electric field may influence the polarity and sensitivity of V(j)-gating but are unlikely to account for the appearance of bipolar V(j)-gating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15298899      PMCID: PMC1304500          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.038448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  13 in total

1.  Voltage gating and permeation in a gap junction hemichannel.

Authors:  E B Trexler; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello; V K Verselis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fluorescence techniques for studying cloned channels and transporters expressed in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  A Cha; N Zerangue; M Kavanaugh; F Bezanilla
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  The first extracellular loop domain is a major determinant of charge selectivity in connexin46 channels.

Authors:  E B Trexler; F F Bukauskas; J Kronengold; T A Bargiello; V K Verselis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions.

Authors:  Y Ri; J A Ballesteros; C K Abrams; S Oh; V K Verselis; H Weinstein; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins.

Authors:  V K Verselis; C S Ginter; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Reversal of the gating polarity of gap junctions by negative charge substitutions in the N-terminus of connexin 32.

Authors:  P E Purnick; S Oh; C K Abrams; V K Verselis; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Changes in permeability caused by connexin 32 mutations underlie X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  S Oh; Y Ri; M V Bennett; E B Trexler; V K Verselis; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Emerging issues of connexin channels: biophysics fills the gap.

Authors:  A L Harris
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.318

9.  Molecular determinants of electrical rectification of single channel conductance in gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32.

Authors:  S Oh; J B Rubin; M V Bennett; V K Verselis; T A Bargiello
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Stoichiometry of transjunctional voltage-gating polarity reversal by a negative charge substitution in the amino terminus of a connexin32 chimera.

Authors:  S Oh; C K Abrams; V K Verselis; T A Bargiello
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Voltage-dependent conformational changes in connexin channels.

Authors:  Thaddeus A Bargiello; Qingxiu Tang; Seunghoon Oh; Taekyung Kwon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-24

Review 2.  Structure of the gap junction channel and its implications for its biological functions.

Authors:  Shoji Maeda; Tomitake Tsukihara
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  The gap junction cellular internet: connexin hemichannels enter the signalling limelight.

Authors:  W Howard Evans; Elke De Vuyst; Luc Leybaert
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 4.  Molecular modeling and mutagenesis of gap junction channels.

Authors:  Julio A Kovacs; Kent A Baker; Guillermo A Altenberg; Ruben Abagyan; Mark Yeager
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 5.  Gap junction channel structure in the early 21st century: facts and fantasies.

Authors:  Mark Yeager; Andrew L Harris
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 8.382

6.  The NH2 terminus regulates voltage-dependent gating of CALHM ion channels.

Authors:  Jessica E Tanis; Zhongming Ma; J Kevin Foskett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.249

7.  Characterization of a novel water pocket inside the human Cx26 hemichannel structure.

Authors:  Raul Araya-Secchi; Tomas Perez-Acle; Seung-Gu Kang; Tien Huynh; Alejandro Bernardin; Yerko Escalona; Jose-Antonio Garate; Agustin D Martínez; Isaac E García; Juan C Sáez; Ruhong Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  The carboxyl terminal residues 220-283 are not required for voltage gating of a chimeric connexin32 hemichannel.

Authors:  Taekyung Kwon; Terry L Dowd; Thaddeus A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Post-translational modifications of connexin26 revealed by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Darren Locke; Shengjie Bian; Hong Li; Andrew L Harris
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Cataract-associated D3Y mutation of human connexin46 (hCx46) increases the dye coupling of gap junction channels and suppresses the voltage sensitivity of hemichannels.

Authors:  Barbara Schlingmann; Patrik Schadzek; Stefan Busko; Alexander Heisterkamp; Anaclet Ngezahayo
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.945

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.