Literature DB >> 11053119

Reversal of the gating polarity of gap junctions by negative charge substitutions in the N-terminus of connexin 32.

P E Purnick1, S Oh, C K Abrams, V K Verselis, T A Bargiello.   

Abstract

Intercellular channels formed by connexins (gap junctions) are sensitive to the application of transjunctional voltage (V(j)), to which they gate by the separate actions of their serially arranged hemichannels (Harris, A. L., D. C. Spray, and M. V. L. Bennett. 1981. J. Gen. Physiol. 77:95-117). Single channel studies of both intercellular and conductive hemichannels have demonstrated the existence of two separate gating mechanisms, termed "V(j)-gating" and "loop gating" (Trexler, E. B., M. V. L. Bennett, T. A. Bargiello, and V. K. Verselis. 1996. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:5836-5841). In Cx32 hemichannels, V(j)-gating occurs at negative V(j) (Oh, S., J. B. Rubin, M. V. L. Bennett, V. K. Verselis, and T. A. Bargiello. 1999. J. Gen. Physiol. 114:339-364; Oh, S., C. K. Abrams, V. K. Verselis, and T. A. Bargiello. 2000. J. Gen. Physiol. 116:13-31). A negative charge substitution at the second amino acid position in the N-terminus reverses the polarity of V(j)-gating of Cx32 hemichannels (Verselis, V. K., C. S. Ginter, and T. A. Bargiello. 1994. Nature. 368:348-351;. J. Gen. Physiol. 116:13-31). We report that placement of a negative charge at the 5th, 8th, 9th, or 10th position can reverse the polarity of Cx32 hemichannel V(j)-gating. We conclude that the 1st through 10th amino acid residues lie within the transjunctional electric field and within the channel pore, as in this position they could sense changes in V(j) and be largely insensitive to changes in absolute membrane potential (V(m)). Conductive hemichannels formed by Cx32*Cx43E1 containing a negatively charged residue at either the 8th or 10th position display bi-polar V(j)-gating; that is, the open probability of hemichannels formed by these connexins is reduced at both positive and negative potentials and is maximal at intermediate voltages. In contrast, Cx32*Cx43E1 hemichannels with negative charges at either the 2nd or 5th positions are uni-polar, closing only at positive V(j). The simplest interpretation of these data is that the Cx32 hemichannel can adopt at least two different open conformations. The 1st-5th residues are located within the electric field in all open channel conformations, while the 8th and 10th residues lie within the electric field in one conformation and outside the electric field in the other conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11053119      PMCID: PMC1301127          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76485-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  26 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of voltage dependence of heterotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32.

Authors:  J B Rubin; V K Verselis; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Voltage gating and permeation in a gap junction hemichannel.

Authors:  E B Trexler; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello; V K Verselis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Voltage-dependent gating of single gap junction channels in an insect cell line.

Authors:  F F Bukauskas; R Weingart
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The diameter of water pores formed by colicin Ia in planar lipid bilayers.

Authors:  O V Krasilnikov; L N Yuldasheva; R A Nogueira; C G Rodrigues
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins.

Authors:  V K Verselis; C S Ginter; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Connexin 32 mutations from X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease patients: functional defects and dominant negative effects.

Authors:  Y Omori; M Mesnil; H Yamasaki
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Null mutations of connexin32 in patients with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  R Bruzzone; T W White; S S Scherer; K H Fischbeck; D L Paul
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Heterotypic gap junction channels (connexin26-connexin32) violate the paradigm of unitary conductance.

Authors:  F F Bukauskas; C Elfgang; K Willecke; R Weingart
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Probing alamethicin channels with water-soluble polymers. Effect on conductance of channel states.

Authors:  S M Bezrukov; I Vodyanoy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Gap junction channels: distinct voltage-sensitive and -insensitive conductance states.

Authors:  A P Moreno; M B Rook; G I Fishman; D C Spray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  74 in total

1.  Aspartic acid residue D3 critically determines Cx50 gap junction channel transjunctional voltage-dependent gating and unitary conductance.

Authors:  Li Xin; So Nakagawa; Tomitake Tsukihara; Donglin Bai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Voltage-dependent conformational changes in connexin channels.

Authors:  Thaddeus A Bargiello; Qingxiu Tang; Seunghoon Oh; Taekyung Kwon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-24

Review 3.  Structure of the gap junction channel and its implications for its biological functions.

Authors:  Shoji Maeda; Tomitake Tsukihara
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Structural determinants for the differences in voltage gating of chicken Cx56 and Cx45.6 gap-junctional hemichannels.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Tong; Lisa Ebihara
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The NH2 terminus regulates voltage-dependent gating of CALHM ion channels.

Authors:  Jessica E Tanis; Zhongming Ma; J Kevin Foskett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.249

6.  Loop gating of connexin hemichannels involves movement of pore-lining residues in the first extracellular loop domain.

Authors:  Vytas K Verselis; Maria P Trelles; Clio Rubinos; Thaddeus A Bargiello; Miduturu Srinivas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Characterization of a novel water pocket inside the human Cx26 hemichannel structure.

Authors:  Raul Araya-Secchi; Tomas Perez-Acle; Seung-Gu Kang; Tien Huynh; Alejandro Bernardin; Yerko Escalona; Jose-Antonio Garate; Agustin D Martínez; Isaac E García; Juan C Sáez; Ruhong Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  The carboxyl terminal residues 220-283 are not required for voltage gating of a chimeric connexin32 hemichannel.

Authors:  Taekyung Kwon; Terry L Dowd; Thaddeus A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  Connexin channel permeability to cytoplasmic molecules.

Authors:  Andrew L Harris
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 3.667

10.  An intact connexin N-terminus is required for function but not gap junction formation.

Authors:  John W Kyle; Peter J Minogue; Bettina C Thomas; Denise A Lopez Domowicz; Viviana M Berthoud; Dorothy A Hanck; Eric C Beyer
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.