Literature DB >> 15296813

When free condoms and spermicide are not enough: barriers and solutions to participant recruitment to community-based trials.

Mark Gabbay1, Joanna Thomas.   

Abstract

While randomised controlled trials remain the accepted 'gold standard' in medical research, participant recruitment is often problematic, particularly with primary care trials or those requiring healthy volunteers. Such difficulties can jeopardise the trial, leading to early abandonment, reduced statistical power or timetable and budget overruns. Substantial changes in recruitment plans may reduce the generalisability of the research. In order to overcome some of the more common recruitment difficulties, it is important that researchers share their recruitment strategy successes and failures. We report our experience of recruiting healthy volunteers to a condom trial, based within primary care and community populations. This was an RCT of the effect that using an additional spermicidal lubricant has on condom failure. We originally aimed to recruit entirely from Family Planning Clinics, but eventually required a wide variety of strategies. Targeted mailings, newspaper coverage and electronic 'posters' were among the most successful we used to bolster clinic recruitment. Concerned at our slow recruitment rates, we conducted a questionnaire survey investigating the reasons for participation and non-participation in the research completed by 101 trial participants, 112 decliners and 90 controls (total 303). The most important reasons given for taking part included 'considering the research to be important' (85%), 'wanting to help the researchers' (70%), 'having time to help' (62%) and 'getting free condoms and lubricant' (56%). The most popular reasons for declining were 'not wanting to use condoms' (38%), 'partner's unwillingness to take part' (29%), 'not wanting to alter usual contraceptive practice' (27%), 'not having time' (21%). Contrary to expectations, embarrassment and fears about confidentiality were relatively unimportant factors in this decision. In conclusion, the key to attaining recruitment targets was the core research team taking an active part, working closely with clinic staff and maintaining tight control of the process. Altruism remains a powerful motivation for participants, supported by incentives and procedural details to minimise personal inconvenience. Even for intimate research topics, these general factors outweigh specific issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15296813     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  7 in total

1.  Value of recruitment strategies used in a primary care practice-based trial.

Authors:  Shellie D Ellis; Alain G Bertoni; Denise E Bonds; C Randall Clinch; Aarthi Balasubramanyam; Caroline Blackwell; Haiying Chen; Michael Lischke; David C Goff
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia.

Authors:  Jennifer Walker; Christopher K Fairley; Eve Urban; Marcus Y Chen; Catriona Bradshaw; Sandra M Walker; Basil Donovan; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Kathleen McNamee; Marian Currie; Marie Pirotta; John Kaldor; Lyle C Gurrin; Hudson Birden; Veerakathy Harindra; Francis J Bowden; Suzanne Garland; Jane M Gunn; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Recruiting older people to a randomised controlled dietary intervention trial--how hard can it be?

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Laura Jones; John M Saxton; Daniel J Flower; Gemma Foulds; Hilary J Powers; Stuart G Parker; A Graham Pockley; Elizabeth A Williams
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  Research participation effects: a skeleton in the methodological cupboard.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Kypros Kypri; Diana Elbourne
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Recruitment of young women to a trial of chlamydia screening - as easy as it sounds?

Authors:  Helen Atherton; Debbie Banks; Ruth Harbit; Linzie Long; Fiona Chadd; Phillip Hay; Sally Kerry; Ian Simms; Pippa Oakeshott
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Using marketing theory to inform strategies for recruitment: a recruitment optimisation model and the txt2stop experience.

Authors:  Leandro Galli; Rosemary Knight; Steven Robertson; Elizabeth Hoile; Olubukola Oladapo; David Francis; Caroline Free
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Optimizing adherence in HIV prevention product trials: Development and psychometric evaluation of simple tools for screening and adherence counseling.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Tolley; Kate Morrow Guthrie; Seth Zissette; Joseph L Fava; Katherine Gill; Cheryl E Louw; Philip Kotze; Krishnaveni Reddy; Kathleen MacQueen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.