PURPOSE: "Physicians-recruiting-physicians" is the preferred recruitment approach for practice-based research. However, yields are variable; and the approach can be costly and lead to biased, unrepresentative samples. We sought to explore the potential efficiency of alternative methods. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the yield and cost of 10 recruitment strategies used to recruit primary care practices to a randomized trial to improve cardiovascular disease risk factor management. We measured response and recruitment yields and the resources used to estimate the value of each strategy. Providers at recruited practices were surveyed about motivation for participation. RESULTS: Response to 6 opt-in marketing strategies was 0.40% (53/13290), ranging from 0% to 2.86% by strategy; 33.96% (18/53) of responders were recruited to the study. Of those recruited from opt-out strategies, 8.68% joined the study, ranging from 5.35% to 41.67% per strategy. A strategy that combined both opt-in and opt-out approaches resulted in a 51.14% (90/176) response and a 10.80% (19/90) recruitment rate. Cost of recruitment was $613 per recruited practice. Recruitment approaches based on in-person meetings (41.67%), previous relationships (33.33%), and borrowing an Area Health Education Center's established networks (10.80%), yielded the most recruited practices per effort and were most cost efficient. Individual providers who chose to participate were motivated by interest in improving their clinical practice (80.5%); contributing to CVD primary prevention (54.4%); and invigorating their practice with new ideas (42.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides suggestions for future recruitment efforts and research. Translational studies with limited funds could consider multi-modal recruitment approaches including in-person presentations to practice groups and exploitation of previous relationships, which require the providers to opt-out, and interactive opt-in approaches which rely on borrowed networks. These approaches can be supplemented with non-relationship-based opt-out strategies such as cold calls strategically targeted to underrepresented provider groups.
PURPOSE: "Physicians-recruiting-physicians" is the preferred recruitment approach for practice-based research. However, yields are variable; and the approach can be costly and lead to biased, unrepresentative samples. We sought to explore the potential efficiency of alternative methods. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the yield and cost of 10 recruitment strategies used to recruit primary care practices to a randomized trial to improve cardiovascular disease risk factor management. We measured response and recruitment yields and the resources used to estimate the value of each strategy. Providers at recruited practices were surveyed about motivation for participation. RESULTS: Response to 6 opt-in marketing strategies was 0.40% (53/13290), ranging from 0% to 2.86% by strategy; 33.96% (18/53) of responders were recruited to the study. Of those recruited from opt-out strategies, 8.68% joined the study, ranging from 5.35% to 41.67% per strategy. A strategy that combined both opt-in and opt-out approaches resulted in a 51.14% (90/176) response and a 10.80% (19/90) recruitment rate. Cost of recruitment was $613 per recruited practice. Recruitment approaches based on in-person meetings (41.67%), previous relationships (33.33%), and borrowing an Area Health Education Center's established networks (10.80%), yielded the most recruited practices per effort and were most cost efficient. Individual providers who chose to participate were motivated by interest in improving their clinical practice (80.5%); contributing to CVD primary prevention (54.4%); and invigorating their practice with new ideas (42.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides suggestions for future recruitment efforts and research. Translational studies with limited funds could consider multi-modal recruitment approaches including in-person presentations to practice groups and exploitation of previous relationships, which require the providers to opt-out, and interactive opt-in approaches which rely on borrowed networks. These approaches can be supplemented with non-relationship-based opt-out strategies such as cold calls strategically targeted to underrepresented provider groups.
Authors: Scott D Halpern; Jason H T Karlawish; David Casarett; Jesse A Berlin; Raymond R Townsend; David A Asch Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth Dormandy; Fred Kavalier; Jane Logan; Hilary Harris; Nola Ishmael; Theresa M Marteau Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Eileen Fairbanks; Shivani Shah; Mary H Wilde; Margaret V McDonald; Judith Brasch; James M McMahon Journal: Appl Nurs Res Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 2.257
Authors: Christopher Sciamanna; Noel H Ballentine; Melissa Bopp; Jennifer S Brach; Vernon M Chinchilli; Joseph T Ciccolo; Molly B Conroy; Abigail Fisher; Edward J Fox; Susan L Greenspan; M Jan De Beur Suzanne; Kalen Kearcher; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Kathleen M McTigue; Edward McAuley; Natalia E Morone; Anuradha Paranjape; Sol Rodriguez-Colon; Andrew Rosenzweig; Joshua M Smyth; Kerry J Stewart; Heather L Stuckey Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Shannon M Sweeney; Jennifer D Hall; Sarah S Ono; Leah Gordon; David Cameron; Jennifer Hemler; Leif I Solberg; Benjamin F Crabtree; Deborah J Cohen Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Lyle J Fagnan; Theresa L Walunas; Michael L Parchman; Caitlin L Dickinson; Katrina M Murphy; Ross Howell; Kathryn L Jackson; Margaret B Madden; James R Ciesla; Kathryn D Mazurek; Abel N Kho; Leif I Solberg Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Robin L Corelli; Alan J Zillich; Carl de Moor; Margherita R Giuliano; Jennifer Arnold; Christine M Fenlon; Cami L Douglas; Brooke Magnusson; Susan M Zbikowski; Alexander V Prokhorov; Karen Suchanek Hudmon Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2012-07-27
Authors: Denise E Bonds; Patricia E Hogan; Alain G Bertoni; Haiying Chen; C Randall Clinch; Ann E Hiott; Erica L Rosenberger; David C Goff Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 4.749