BACKGROUND: Cohort studies are an important study design however they are difficult to implement, often suffer from poor retention, low participation and bias. The aims of this paper are to describe the methods used to recruit and retain young women in a longitudinal study and to explore factors associated with loss to follow up. METHODS: The Chlamydia Incidence and Re-infection Rates Study (CIRIS) was a longitudinal study of Australian women aged 16 to 25 years recruited from primary health care clinics. They were followed up via the post at three-monthly intervals and required to return questionnaires and self collected vaginal swabs for chlamydia testing. The protocol was designed to maximise retention in the study and included using recruiting staff independent of the clinic staff, recruiting in private, regular communication with study staff, making the follow up as straightforward as possible and providing incentives and small gifts to engender good will. RESULTS: The study recruited 66% of eligible women. Despite the nature of the study (sexual health) and the mobility of the women (35% moved address at least once), 79% of the women completed the final stage of the study after 12 months. Loss to follow up bias was associated with lower education level [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 0.7 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.5, 1.0)], recruitment from a sexual health centre as opposed to a general practice clinic [AHR: 1.6 (95% CI: 1.0, 2.7)] and previously testing positive for chlamydia [AHR: 0.8 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.0)]. No other factors such as age, numbers of sexual partners were associated with loss to follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used were considered effective for recruiting and retaining women in the study. Further research is needed to improve participation from less well-educated women.
BACKGROUND: Cohort studies are an important study design however they are difficult to implement, often suffer from poor retention, low participation and bias. The aims of this paper are to describe the methods used to recruit and retain young women in a longitudinal study and to explore factors associated with loss to follow up. METHODS: The Chlamydia Incidence and Re-infection Rates Study (CIRIS) was a longitudinal study of Australian women aged 16 to 25 years recruited from primary health care clinics. They were followed up via the post at three-monthly intervals and required to return questionnaires and self collected vaginal swabs for chlamydia testing. The protocol was designed to maximise retention in the study and included using recruiting staff independent of the clinic staff, recruiting in private, regular communication with study staff, making the follow up as straightforward as possible and providing incentives and small gifts to engender good will. RESULTS: The study recruited 66% of eligible women. Despite the nature of the study (sexual health) and the mobility of the women (35% moved address at least once), 79% of the women completed the final stage of the study after 12 months. Loss to follow up bias was associated with lower education level [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 0.7 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.5, 1.0)], recruitment from a sexual health centre as opposed to a general practice clinic [AHR: 1.6 (95% CI: 1.0, 2.7)] and previously testing positive for chlamydia [AHR: 0.8 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.0)]. No other factors such as age, numbers of sexual partners were associated with loss to follow up. CONCLUSIONS: The methods used were considered effective for recruiting and retaining women in the study. Further research is needed to improve participation from less well-educated women.
Authors: W L Whittington; C Kent; P Kissinger; M K Oh; J D Fortenberry; S E Hillis; B Litchfield; G A Bolan; M E St Louis; T A Farley; H H Handsfield Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: D Scott Lamontagne; Kathleen Baster; Lynsey Emmett; Tom Nichols; Sarah Randall; Louise McLean; Paula Meredith; Veerakathy Harindra; Jean M Tobin; Gillian S Underhill; W Graham Hewitt; Jennifer Hopwood; Toni Gleave; Ajit K Ghosh; Harry Mallinson; Alisha R Davies; Gwenda Hughes; Kevin A Fenton Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Byron E Batteiger; Wanzhu Tu; Susan Ofner; Barbara Van Der Pol; Diane R Stothard; Donald P Orr; Barry P Katz; J Dennis Fortenberry Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Anthony M A Smith; Chris E Rissel; Juliet Richters; Andrew E Grulich; Richard O de Visser Journal: Aust N Z J Public Health Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.939
Authors: Jennifer Walker; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Christopher K Fairley; Marcus Y Chen; Catriona S Bradshaw; Jimmy Twin; Nicole Taylor; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Kathleen McNamee; Eve Urban; Sandra Walker; Marian Currie; Hudson Birden; Francis Bowden; Jane Gunn; Marie Pirotta; Lyle Gurrin; Veerakathy Harindra; Suzanne M Garland; Jane S Hocking Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jane S Hocking; Lenka A Vodstrcil; Wilhelmina M Huston; Peter Timms; Marcus Y Chen; Karen Worthington; Ruthy McIver; Sepehr N Tabrizi Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-08-17 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Samantha Teague; George J Youssef; Jacqui A Macdonald; Emma Sciberras; Adrian Shatte; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Chris Greenwood; Jennifer McIntosh; Craig A Olsson; Delyse Hutchinson Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Dylan N Clements; Ian G Handel; Erica Rose; Damon Querry; Carys A Pugh; William Er Ollier; Kenton L Morgan; Lorna J Kennedy; Jeffery Sampson; Kim M Summers; B Mark C de Bronsvoort Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Catriona S Bradshaw; Jennifer Walker; Christopher K Fairley; Marcus Y Chen; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Kathryn McNamee; Eve Urban; Sandra Walker; Marian Currie; Hudson Birden; Francis Bowden; Suzanne Garland; Marie Pirotta; Lyle Gurrin; Jane S Hocking Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Titia Heijman; Hannelore M Götz; Patricia Zaandam; Juliën Wijers; Jeanine Leenen; Geneviève van Liere; Jeanne Heil; Stephanie Brinkhues; Astrid Wielemaker; Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Petra F G Wolffs; Sylvia M Bruisten; Mieke Steenbakkers; Arjan A Hogewoning; Henry J de Vries; Christian J P A Hoebe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 3.240