Literature DB >> 21385471

Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia.

Jennifer Walker1, Christopher K Fairley, Eve Urban, Marcus Y Chen, Catriona Bradshaw, Sandra M Walker, Basil Donovan, Sepehr N Tabrizi, Kathleen McNamee, Marian Currie, Marie Pirotta, John Kaldor, Lyle C Gurrin, Hudson Birden, Veerakathy Harindra, Francis J Bowden, Suzanne Garland, Jane M Gunn, Jane S Hocking.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cohort studies are an important study design however they are difficult to implement, often suffer from poor retention, low participation and bias. The aims of this paper are to describe the methods used to recruit and retain young women in a longitudinal study and to explore factors associated with loss to follow up.
METHODS: The Chlamydia Incidence and Re-infection Rates Study (CIRIS) was a longitudinal study of Australian women aged 16 to 25 years recruited from primary health care clinics. They were followed up via the post at three-monthly intervals and required to return questionnaires and self collected vaginal swabs for chlamydia testing. The protocol was designed to maximise retention in the study and included using recruiting staff independent of the clinic staff, recruiting in private, regular communication with study staff, making the follow up as straightforward as possible and providing incentives and small gifts to engender good will.
RESULTS: The study recruited 66% of eligible women. Despite the nature of the study (sexual health) and the mobility of the women (35% moved address at least once), 79% of the women completed the final stage of the study after 12 months. Loss to follow up bias was associated with lower education level [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 0.7 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.5, 1.0)], recruitment from a sexual health centre as opposed to a general practice clinic [AHR: 1.6 (95% CI: 1.0, 2.7)] and previously testing positive for chlamydia [AHR: 0.8 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.0)]. No other factors such as age, numbers of sexual partners were associated with loss to follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: The methods used were considered effective for recruiting and retaining women in the study. Further research is needed to improve participation from less well-educated women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385471      PMCID: PMC3061916          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  17 in total

1.  Use of an online questionnaire for follow-up of young female students recruited to a randomised controlled trial of chlamydia screening.

Authors:  Helen Atherton; Pippa Oakeshott; Adamma Aghaizu; Phillip Hay; Sally Kerry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Chlamydia screening--Australia should strive to achieve what others have not.

Authors:  Jane S Hocking; Jennifer Walker; David Regan; Marcus Y Chen; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: results of a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  W L Whittington; C Kent; P Kissinger; M K Oh; J D Fortenberry; S E Hillis; B Litchfield; G A Bolan; M E St Louis; T A Farley; H H Handsfield
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16-24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group.

Authors:  D Scott Lamontagne; Kathleen Baster; Lynsey Emmett; Tom Nichols; Sarah Randall; Louise McLean; Paula Meredith; Veerakathy Harindra; Jean M Tobin; Gillian S Underhill; W Graham Hewitt; Jennifer Hopwood; Toni Gleave; Ajit K Ghosh; Harry Mallinson; Alisha R Davies; Gwenda Hughes; Kevin A Fenton
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Repeated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in adolescent women.

Authors:  Byron E Batteiger; Wanzhu Tu; Susan Ofner; Barbara Van Der Pol; Diane R Stothard; Donald P Orr; Barry P Katz; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Barriers to opportunistic chlamydia testing in primary care.

Authors:  Cliodna A M McNulty; Elaine Freeman; Jo Bowen; Julia Shefras; Kevin A Fenton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Sexual diversity in urban Norwegians.

Authors:  Bente Traeen; Hein Stigum; Dagfinn Søorensen
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2002-11

8.  Sex in Australia: the rationale and methods of the Australian Study of Health and Relationships.

Authors:  Anthony M A Smith; Chris E Rissel; Juliet Richters; Andrew E Grulich; Richard O de Visser
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.939

9.  Subsequent sexually transmitted infections among adolescent women with genital infection due to Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, or Trichomonas vaginalis.

Authors:  J D Fortenberry; E J Brizendine; B P Katz; K K Wools; M J Blythe; D P Orr
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Recruitment of young women to a trial of chlamydia screening - as easy as it sounds?

Authors:  Helen Atherton; Debbie Banks; Ruth Harbit; Linzie Long; Fiona Chadd; Phillip Hay; Sally Kerry; Ian Simms; Pippa Oakeshott
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  13 in total

1.  Development and preliminary results of the Financial Incentive Coercion Assessment questionnaire.

Authors:  Margaret M Byrne; Jason R Croft; Michael T French; Karen L Dugosh; David S Festinger
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-11-23

Review 2.  Challenging recruitment of youth with type 2 diabetes into clinical trials.

Authors:  Tammy T Nguyen; Vikas Jayadeva; Giovanni Cizza; Rebecca J Brown; Radha Nandagopal; Luisa M Rodriguez; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Chlamydia trachomatis incidence and re-infection among young women--behavioural and microbiological characteristics.

Authors:  Jennifer Walker; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Christopher K Fairley; Marcus Y Chen; Catriona S Bradshaw; Jimmy Twin; Nicole Taylor; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Kathleen McNamee; Eve Urban; Sandra Walker; Marian Currie; Hudson Birden; Francis Bowden; Jane Gunn; Marie Pirotta; Lyle Gurrin; Veerakathy Harindra; Suzanne M Garland; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A cohort study of Chlamydia trachomatis treatment failure in women: a study protocol.

Authors:  Jane S Hocking; Lenka A Vodstrcil; Wilhelmina M Huston; Peter Timms; Marcus Y Chen; Karen Worthington; Ruthy McIver; Sepehr N Tabrizi
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Recruitment and retention strategies and the examination of attrition bias in a randomised controlled trial in children's centres serving families in disadvantaged areas of England.

Authors:  Paul Hindmarch; Adrian Hawkins; Elaine McColl; Mike Hayes; Gosia Majsak-Newman; Joanne Ablewhite; Toity Deave; Denise Kendrick
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samantha Teague; George J Youssef; Jacqui A Macdonald; Emma Sciberras; Adrian Shatte; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Chris Greenwood; Jennifer McIntosh; Craig A Olsson; Delyse Hutchinson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Dogslife: a web-based longitudinal study of Labrador Retriever health in the UK.

Authors:  Dylan N Clements; Ian G Handel; Erica Rose; Damon Querry; Carys A Pugh; William Er Ollier; Kenton L Morgan; Lorna J Kennedy; Jeffery Sampson; Kim M Summers; B Mark C de Bronsvoort
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  The validity of self-initiated, event-driven infectious disease reporting in general population cohorts.

Authors:  Hanna Merk; Sharon Kühlmann-Berenzon; Christin Bexelius; Sven Sandin; Jan-Eric Litton; Annika Linde; Olof Nyrén
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prevalent and incident bacterial vaginosis are associated with sexual and contraceptive behaviours in young Australian women.

Authors:  Catriona S Bradshaw; Jennifer Walker; Christopher K Fairley; Marcus Y Chen; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Kathryn McNamee; Eve Urban; Sandra Walker; Marian Currie; Hudson Birden; Francis Bowden; Suzanne Garland; Marie Pirotta; Lyle Gurrin; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Participation, retention, and associated factors of women in a prospective multicenter study on Chlamydia trachomatis infections (FemCure).

Authors:  Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Titia Heijman; Hannelore M Götz; Patricia Zaandam; Juliën Wijers; Jeanine Leenen; Geneviève van Liere; Jeanne Heil; Stephanie Brinkhues; Astrid Wielemaker; Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Petra F G Wolffs; Sylvia M Bruisten; Mieke Steenbakkers; Arjan A Hogewoning; Henry J de Vries; Christian J P A Hoebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.