Literature DB >> 15295602

Optimal neural population coding of an auditory spatial cue.

Nicol S Harper1, David McAlpine.   

Abstract

A sound, depending on the position of its source, can take more time to reach one ear than the other. This interaural (between the ears) time difference (ITD) provides a major cue for determining the source location. Many auditory neurons are sensitive to ITDs, but the means by which such neurons represent ITD is a contentious issue. Recent studies question whether the classical general model (the Jeffress model) applies across species. Here we show that ITD coding strategies of different species can be explained by a unifying principle: that the ITDs an animal naturally encounters should be coded with maximal accuracy. Using statistical techniques and a stochastic neural model, we demonstrate that the optimal coding strategy for ITD depends critically on head size and sound frequency. For small head sizes and/or low-frequency sounds, the optimal coding strategy tends towards two distinct sub-populations tuned to ITDs outside the range created by the head. This is consistent with recent observations in small mammals. For large head sizes and/or high frequencies, the optimal strategy is a homogeneous distribution of ITD tunings within the range created by the head. This is consistent with observations in the barn owl. For humans, the optimal strategy to code ITDs from an acoustically measured distribution depends on frequency; above 400 Hz a homogeneous distribution is optimal, and below 400 Hz distinct sub-populations are optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295602     DOI: 10.1038/nature02768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  110 in total

1.  Nonlinear Dynamics of Neuronal Excitability, Oscillations, and Coincidence Detection.

Authors:  John Rinzel; Gemma Huguet
Journal:  Commun Pure Appl Math       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.219

2.  Adaptive coding is constrained to midline locations in a spatial listening task.

Authors:  J K Maier; P Hehrmann; N S Harper; G M Klump; D Pressnitzer; D McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Systematic representation of sound locations in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Relative sound localisation abilities in human listeners.

Authors:  Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Creating a sense of auditory space.

Authors:  David McAlpine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  The analysis of interaural time differences in the chick brain stem.

Authors:  Richard L Hyson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-10-03

8.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Decorrelation sensitivity of auditory nerve and anteroventral cochlear nucleus fibers to broadband and narrowband noise.

Authors:  Dries H G Louage; Philip X Joris; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.