Literature DB >> 15295343

Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities.

Kypros H Nicolaides1.   

Abstract

There is extensive evidence that effective screening for major chromosomal abnormalities can be provided in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prospective studies in a total of 200,868 pregnancies, including 871 fetuses with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that increased nuchal translucency can identify 76.8% of fetuses with trisomy 21, which represents a false-positive rate of 4.2%. When fetal nuchal translucency was combined with maternal serum free-beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in prospective studies in a total of 44,613 pregnancies, including 215 fetuses with trisomy 21, the detection rate was 87.0% for a false-positive rate of 5.0%. Studies from specialist centers with 15,822 pregnancies, which included 397 fetuses with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that the absence of the nasal bone can identify 69.0% of trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a false-positive rate of 1.4%. It has been estimated that first-trimester screening by a combination of sonography and maternal serum testing can identify 97% of trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a false-positive rate of 5%, or that the detection rate can be 91%, which represents a false-positive rate of 0.5%. In addition to increased nuchal translucency, important sonographic markers for chromosomal abnormalities, include fetal growth restriction, tachycardia, abnormal flow in the ductus venosus, megacystis, exomphalos and single umbilical artery. Most pregnant women prefer screening in the first, rather than in the second, trimester. As with all aspects of good clinical practice, those care givers who perform first-trimester screening should be trained appropriately, and their results should be subjected to external quality assurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295343     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  59 in total

1.  Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland.

Authors:  Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Vilhjálmur Arnason
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-02

2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Down syndrome pregnancy.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Chen-ming Xu; Yi-min Zhu; Min-yue Dong; Yu-li Qian; Fan Jin; He-feng Huang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Neonatal periventricular leukomalacia without evidence of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome following discordance in nuchal translucency: a case report.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Nakajima; Naoki Masaoka
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Correlation between serum biochemical markers and early amniocentesis in diagnosis of congenital fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Dragan Loncar; Mirjana Varjacic; Tanja Novakovic; Dragan Milovanovic; Slobodan Jankovic
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 5.  An Older Woman in Early Pregnancy: What Antenatal Screening is Appropriate?

Authors:  S Sulaiha Aznal
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2008-12-31

6.  Pregnancy Outcome of Abnormal Nuchal Translucency: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nasibeh Roozbeh; Maryam Azizi; Leili Darvish
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Aimée C Dane; Madelyn Peterson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Fetal echocardiography: where are we?

Authors:  Anita Saxena; N Reeni Soni
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 9.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Brynn Levy
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

10.  How do the trends in the prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy change after a non-invasive prenatal test becomes available? A Japanese single center study.

Authors:  Junichi Hasegawa; Masamitsu Nakamura; Akihiko Sekizawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 1.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.