Literature DB >> 15290659

Clinical application of polymerase chain reaction to diagnose Clostridium difficile in hospitalized patients with diarrhea.

Michael S Morelli1, Susan D Rouster, Ralph A Giannella, Kenneth E Sherman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clostridium difficile is a common cause of diarrhea in hospitalized patients and is associated with significant morbidity and cost. The current diagnostic standard, enzyme immunoassay (EIA), has low sensitivity, leading to duplicate testing and empiric treatment. We sought to show the usefulness and potential cost effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of toxin B gene for diagnosis of C. difficile-induced diarrhea.
METHODS: A total of 148 stool samples from academic and community-based hospitals were sent for EIA testing and were evaluated prospectively for the presence of toxin B gene by PCR. Results were compared with EIA regarding sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Medical charts were reviewed to determine the following: (1) number of EIAs sent per admission, (2) number sent within a 24-hour time period, and (3) how caregivers practiced based on EIA results.
RESULTS: The mean age of 130 patients was 55 years. EIA and PCR were positive in 6.8% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. EIA sensitivity was 40%, specificity was 98%, and positive and negative predictive values were 80% and 91%, respectively. The cost of the PCR was $22/sample. Empiric treatment for C. difficile was given unnecessarily in 42% of EIA-negative results. Thirty percent of patients had 3 or more EIAs sent during their hospital admission. Of patients with multiple samples sent, 57% had more than 1 sample sent in a 24-hour period.
CONCLUSIONS: Many physicians do not conform to practice guidelines regarding recommended diagnosis and empiric treatment of C. difficile. Toxin B gene PCR represents a more sensitive and potentially cost-effective method to diagnose C. difficile-induced diarrhea than EIA and should be considered for use as an alternative diagnostic standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15290659     DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00290-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  8 in total

1.  Fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis in a post-liver transplant patient.

Authors:  Maximilian Lee; Andrew A Shelton; Waldo L Concepcion; Clark A Bonham; Tami J Daugherty
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Laboratory testing considerations for C. difficile disease.

Authors:  David F Welch
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2006-01

3.  Characteristics and Antibiotic Use Associated With Short-Term Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection Among Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Sol del Mar Aldrete; Matthew J Magee; Rachel J Friedman-Moraco; Austin W Chan; Grier G Banks; Eileen M Burd; Colleen S Kraft
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.

Authors:  Bobby L Boyanton; Preethi Sural; Caroline R Loomis; Christine Pesta; Laura Gonzalez-Krellwitz; Barbara Robinson-Dunn; Paul Riska
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The value of repeat Clostridium difficile toxin testing during and after an outbreak of C difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Joseph Dylewski
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Clostridium difficile infection and inflammatory bowel disease: understanding the evolving relationship.

Authors:  Udayakumar Navaneethan; Preethi Gk Venkatesh; Bo Shen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Nonutility of repeat laboratory testing for detection of Clostridium difficile by use of PCR or enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Elisabeth Aichinger; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; Lisa M Nyre; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Kvach; David Ferguson; Paul F Riska; Marie L Landry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.