Literature DB >> 15290067

Accuracy of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. A prospective study in 548 patients.

Jan L M A Gielen1, Arthur M De Schepper, Filip Vanhoenacker, Paul M Parizel, Xiaoling L Wang, Raf Sciot, Joost Weyler.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to assess prospectively the value of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors (STT) and soft tissue tumor-like lesions in a multi-institutional setting by a group of experts. The material consisted of 548 untreated and proven STT or tumor-like lesions originating from a multi-institutional database of STT in which 930 consecutive patients with STT examined by MRI were registered between 1 January 2001 and 28 April 2003. Based on MRI findings, a suitably ordered differential diagnosis was made in consensus by two radiologists (J.L.M.A.G and A.M.D.S). MRI diagnoses were compared with histology results (455 cases, 83%) and/or 6-month follow-up (93 cases, 17%) as reference standards. The correlation between the MRI and histological diagnosis and between the radiological and histological phenotype were statistically determined. One hundred twenty-three patients presented with a malignant STT; 425 patients presented with a benign one. Concerning differentiation between malignant and benign lesions (dignity), a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 82%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 98% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 60% with accuracy of 85% were obtained. Concerning phenotype characterization, if only the first MRI diagnosis was taken into account, a sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 98%, NPV of 98%, PPV of 70% and accuracy of 96% were obtained. For benign lesions, sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 98%, NPV of 98%, PPV of 76% and accuracy of 97% were obtained. The phenotype's definition of malignant STT had a sensitivity of 37%, a specificity of 96%, NPV of 96%, PPV of 40% and an accuracy of 92%. A correct diagnosis compared with histological assessment was proposed in 227(50%) of the 455 histologically confirmed cases. Despite non-quantified MR parameter evaluation, the results of our prospective study were better than those reported in previous studies and demonstrated the need for a centralized approach to such rare pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15290067     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2431-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  58 in total

1.  A scale of methodological quality for clinical studies of radiologic examinations.

Authors:  L Arrivé; R Renard; F Carrat; A Belkacem; H Dahan; P Le Hir; L Monnier-Cholley; J M Tubiana
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Imaging of benign and malignant soft tissue masses of the foot.

Authors:  Simone Waldt; Hans Rechl; Ernst J Rummeny; Klaus Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  MR imaging of benign soft-tissue masses.

Authors:  M Sundaram; M J Sharafuddin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media.

Authors:  H Daldrup; D M Shames; M Wendland; Y Okuhata; T M Link; W Rosenau; Y Lu; R C Brasch
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1998-02

5.  Statistical analysis of MRI parameters predicting malignancy in 141 soft tissue masses.

Authors:  A M De Schepper; F A Ramon; H R Degryse
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1992-06

6.  CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.

Authors:  D M Panicek; C Gatsonis; D I Rosenthal; L L Seeger; A G Huvos; S G Moore; D J Caudry; W E Palmer; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The value of fat-suppressed T2 or STIR sequences in distinguishing lipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma.

Authors:  J Galant; L Martí-Bonmatí; F Sáez; R Soler; R Alcalá-Santaella; M Navarro
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of soft-tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  J D Lucas; M J O'Doherty; J C Wong; J B Bingham; P H McKee; C D Fletcher; M A Smith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-05

9.  Grading of subcutaneous soft tissue tumors by means of their relationship with the superficial fascia on MR imaging.

Authors:  J Galant; L Martí-Bonmatí; R Soler; F Saez; J Lafuente; C Bonmatí; I Gonzalez
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, giant cell fibroblastoma, and hybrid lesions in children: clinicopathologic comparative analysis of 28 cases with molecular data--a study from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Terrier-Lacombe; Louis Guillou; Georges Maire; Philippe Terrier; Dominique Ranchère Vince; Nicolas de Saint Aubain Somerhausen; Françoise Collin; Florence Pedeutour; Jean-Michel Coindre
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  37 in total

1.  Conventional MR and diffusion-weighted imaging of musculoskeletal soft tissue malignancy: correlation with histologic grading.

Authors:  Avneesh Chhabra; Oganes Ashikyan; Chenelle Slepicka; Nathan Dettori; Helena Hwang; Alexandra Callan; Rohit R Sharma; Yin Xi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Characterisation of intra-articular soft tissue tumours and tumour-like lesions.

Authors:  Matthew E Adams; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Clear cell sarcoma-A review.

Authors:  Rami Mossad Ibrahim; Signe Steenstrup Jensen; Jacob Juel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-09-06

Review 4.  Imaging and diagnostic strategy of soft tissue tumors in children.

Authors:  Hervé Brisse; Daniel Orbach; Jerzy Klijanienko; Paul Fréneaux; Sylvia Neuenschwander
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MRI texture analysis predicts p53 status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Dang; J T Lysack; T Wu; T W Matthews; S P Chandarana; N T Brockton; P Bose; G Bansal; H Cheng; J R Mitchell; J C Dort
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Soft tissue tumours: imaging strategy.

Authors:  Hervé J Brisse; Daniel Orbach; Jerzy Klijanienko
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30

7.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation between malignant peripheral nerve-sheath tumors and non-neurogenic malignant soft-tissue tumors.

Authors:  B H Van Herendael; S R G Heyman; F M Vanhoenacker; G De Temmerman; J L Bloem; P M Parizel; A M De Schepper
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Michael A Jacobs; Xin Wang; John A Carrino; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Shuji Nagata; Hiroshi Nishimura; Masafumi Uchida; Jun Sakoda; Tatsuyuki Tonan; Kouji Hiraoka; Kensei Nagata; Jun Akiba; Toshi Abe; Naofumi Hayabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-07-27

10.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the initial characterization of non-fatty soft tissue tumors: correlation between T2 signal intensity and ADC values.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Frederique Gay; Bailiang Chen; Marie Zins; François Sirveaux; Jacques Felblinger; Alain Blum
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.