Literature DB >> 26499510

20 g PPV with indocyanine green-assisted ILM peeling versus 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G-assisted ILM peeling for epiretinal membrane.

Kleanthis Manousaridis1, Silvia Peter2, Stefan Mennel2.   

Abstract

To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of 20 gauge (g) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with indocyanine green (ICG)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G (BBG)-assisted ILM peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). 38 eyes of 38 patients with idiopathic ERM were included. They were divided in two groups: group 1 (18 eyes) underwent 20 g PPV with ICG-assisted ILM peeling and group 2 (20 eyes) 23 g PPV with BBG-assisted ILM peeling. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were compared. Average BCVA in group 1 improved significantly from 0.60 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (log MAR) at baseline to 0.3 log MAR postoperatively. Average BCVA in group 2 improved significantly from 0.60 log MAR at baseline to 0.3 log MAR postoperatively. Mean CMT reduced significantly from 473 to 375 μm in group 1 and from 486 to 396 μm in group 2. There were no significant differences in the BCVA and CMT between the groups. Both surgical methods appeared to be safe and provided similar anatomical and visual outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brilliant blue G; Epiretinal membrane; Indocyanine green; Optical coherence tomography; Vitrectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26499510     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-015-0148-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  28 in total

Review 1.  External diaphanoscopic illuminator: a new device for visualization in pars plana vitrectomy.

Authors:  J C Schmidt; G W Nietgen; L Hesse; P Kroll
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Claus Eckardt
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2005 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Alvin Kh Kwok; Timothy Yy Lai; Kenneth Sc Yuen
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Value of preoperative optical coherence tomography for predicting visual outcome after epiretinal membrane surgery.

Authors:  Teresa Barth; Florian Zeman; Horst Helbig; Andreea Gamulescu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Brilliant Blue G double staining enhances successful internal limiting membrane peeling with minimal adverse effect by low cellular permeability into live cells.

Authors:  Toshio Hisatomi; Shoji Notomi; Takashi Tachibana; Seiichiro Oishi; Ryo Asato; Takehiro Yamashita; Yusuke Murakami; Yasuhiro Ikeda; Hiroshi Enaida; Taiji Sakamoto; Tatsuro Ishibashi
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  ILM peeling technique influences the degree of a dissociated optic nerve fibre layer appearance after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  David H W Steel; Christiana Dinah; Maged Habib; Kathryn White
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Persistence of fundus fluorescence after use of indocyanine green for macular surgery.

Authors:  Ramin Tadayoni; Michel Paques; Jean François Girmens; Pascale Massin; Alain Gaudric
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Macular function and morphology after peeling of idiopathic epiretinal membrane with and without the assistance of indocyanine green.

Authors:  J Hillenkamp; P Saikia; F Gora; H G Sachs; C P Lohmann; J Roider; W Bäumler; V-P Gabel
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Peripheral visual field defects after macular hole surgery: a complication with decreasing incidence.

Authors:  C A Gass; C Haritoglou; E M Messmer; M Schaumberger; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane removal in epiretinal membrane surgery: a clinical and histologic study.

Authors:  Alvin K H Kwok; Timothy Y Y Lai; Winnie W Y Li; Donald C F Woo; Nongnart R Chan
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  3 in total

1.  Internal limiting membrane peeling with different dyes in the surgery of idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review of literature and network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Ran You; Min Li; Xiao-Xiao Guo; Lu Zhao; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: safety, efficacy and patient related outcomes.

Authors:  Lorenzo Iuliano; Giovanni Fogliato; Francesca Gorgoni; Eleonora Corbelli; Francesco Bandello; Marco Codenotti
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-15

3.  Vitrectomy for the removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane with or without internal limiting membrane peeling: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eleni Christodoulou; Georgios Batsos; Petros Galanis; Christos Kalogeropoulos; Andreas Katsanos; Yannis Alamanos; Maria Stefaniotou
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.